From the responses, I'd say you're gathering dust here --
However, there should be NO teaching of religion in any public school.
Nor should US Federal or State governments, or local governments provide any
financial assistance to any religion.
Additionally, only a Church and its surrounding property and soup kitchens should be tax-exempt.
All of a Church's stock portfolio should be taxed, its real estate holdings, and any business interests.
U.S. District Judge Howard Sachs granted a preliminary injunction invalidating requirements for the state’s abortion clinics to meet standards for surgical centers and for their doctors to have hospital privileges, **citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down similar restrictions in Texas, which deemed those laws unnecessary and unconstitutional.
**>
“Missouri has not complied with that decision,” Sachs, of the Western District of Missouri in Kansas City, wrote.
So what Missouri was trying to do was "unnecessary" and "Un-Constitutional" --
According to your nonsense OP, this means "US Supreme Court is teamed up with the Satanic Temple."
view the rest of the comments →
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Votescam! Come in, Votescam! =p
carmencita ago
Yes Calling @Votescam We need your input.
Votescam ago
From the responses, I'd say you're gathering dust here --
However, there should be NO teaching of religion in any public school.
Nor should US Federal or State governments, or local governments provide any financial assistance to any religion.
Additionally, only a Church and its surrounding property and soup kitchens should be tax-exempt.
All of a Church's stock portfolio should be taxed, its real estate holdings, and any business interests.
So what Missouri was trying to do was "unnecessary" and "Un-Constitutional" --
According to your nonsense OP, this means "US Supreme Court is teamed up with the Satanic Temple."
Good work -- stick with it!