You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

twistedmac11 ago

Am i missing something here? You made a claim saying

I DID A CURSORY LOOK AT NCMEC POSTINGS FOR A FEW STATES AND FOUND SOME ODD THINGS which made me wonder if the pedophiles don't shop NCMEC for their kids. ARE THE NAMES OF THE KIDS MISSING IN VIRGINIA REALLY THE KID'S NAME? ARE THEY THE CONTACT PERSON'S NAME? IS THE POST JUST SO THE 'BUYERS' CAN SEE A DESCRIPTION OF THE KIDS AVAILABLE FOR SALE?

And then go on to talk about the absurd amount of missing info on kids missing from Virginia, which was covered months ago. Where's the rest of the info to back up your theory? Honestly this seems like a shill post, with a bunch of capital/bold letters, a big claim, and nothing to back it up except recycled info. Maybe I'm missing something?

DanKeyhote ago

Point out that the premise is weak if not baseless (a demand for child auction blocks), collect two downvoats.

Serves you right for raining on their circle jerk.

twistedmac11 ago

It just seemed like a wild question to pose and then just not follow up on it. I thought that he was going to provide more evidence to show what brought him to that possibility, but instead he went on to talk about the high rate of missing photos for kids in Virginia, which has already been covered, and never worked his original question back into the statement. It just seemed like a whole bunch of capital letters and no real information.