SOME ODD THINGS ABOUT THE POSTINGS OF MISSING KIDS IN VIRGINIA ON NCMEC COMPARED TO OTHER STATES (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Commoner

I DID A CURSORY LOOK AT NCMEC POSTINGS FOR A FEW STATES AND FOUND SOME ODD THINGS which made me wonder if the pedophiles don't shop NCMEC for their kids. ARE THE NAMES OF THE KIDS MISSING IN VIRGINIA REALLY THE KID'S NAME? ARE THEY THE CONTACT PERSON'S NAME? IS THE POST JUST SO THE 'BUYERS' CAN SEE A DESCRIPTION OF THE KIDS AVAILABLE FOR SALE? Please read the last bit on here for an interesting comment.

VIRGINA HAS 361 POSTS OF MISSING KIDS LISTED ON THEIR SITE, NEARLY HALF HAVE NO PICTURE

  • 6 of them are 'found bodies' or 'John or Jane Does'

  • There are 170 postings for missing children with A NAME but NO picture, and MOST, except a handful, OF THE NAMES APPEAR TO BE HISPANIC/ASAIN/ AFRICAN

  • 132* of the 170 WITH NO PIC are missing as of 2017

  • 82 of the 132* are missing as of July 2017 - VERY RECENT

COMPARE THAT TO MISSOURI , IOWA , and KANSAS

IOWA HAS 11 POSTINGS for missing kids, ALL OF THEM HAVE PICTURES

MISSOURI HAS 66 POSTINGS for missing kids , ALL OF THEM HAVE PICTURES

KANSAS HAS 27 POSTINGS for missing kids, ALL BUT ONE HAS A PICTURE (a missing baby)

NOW LOOK AT TEXAS

TEXAS HAS 324 POSTINGS FOR MISSING KIDS - ABOUT SAME AS VIRGINIA

ALL HAVE PICTUES OR ARTIST RENDERINGS IN THE CASES OF FOUND BODIES

WHAT IS UNUSUAL ABOUT TEXAS is that they have 24 POSTS FOR FOUND JOHN/JANE DOES

EXAMPLE OF JOHN DOE FOUND IN TEXAS

On October 30, 2007, the body of an unidentified Hispanic male, age 18-30, was located in a field behind an office building located at 1800 Wittington Place in Farmer’s Branch, Texas (Dallas County). It is believed the John Doe had been deceased for 1 or 2 days prior to discovery. He had black hair, styled in a Mohawk. He had multiple circular scars on the anterior and posterior surfaces of his forearms and legs and three parallel linear scars on his anterior left wrist. He had a tattoo of a barcode with “080387” on his right shoulder. He was found wearing a black and blue zippered sweatshirt ("Iron Fist" brand), a red “Reebok” brand shirt with "New Jersey" and "Jason Kidd" printed on it (described as a basketball jersey), black jogging pants ("Athletic Works" brand) and white athletic style shoes. He was wearing a yellow metal bead necklace and had a yellow metal square earring with a clear stone in his right ear. He also had a white cloth band around his left ankle. The reconstruction featured above is an artist’s rendering of what the John Doe may have looked like. Anyone with information should contact the Farmers Branch Police Department, reference case number 151838 or the Dallas County Medical Examiner’s Office, reference case number 3729-07-2722Z. http://www.missingkids.org/poster/NCMU/1184585/1/screen

I LOOKED INTO THIS AFTER THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THIS POST "Have you ever wondered why there was ONE SERVICE the Federal Government actually WANTED to privatize and passed a law to do so. That service is the Nat'l Center for Missing and Exploited Children" https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2027241

POST WORTH READING IS BELOW:

[–] rachel-snider 0 points (+0|-0) 13 hours ago  I am a new poster, but not a new user. I was given some interesting information on NCMEC and in particular the state of Virginia. It appears that Virginia has a larger than normal amount of missing children that have no picture attached. I had this infographic appear in my timeline and tagged for me specifically http://i67.tinypic.com/11tstn4.jpgJPG which led me asking the original poster where his info came from. That led here https://8ch.net/pol/res/10588784.html which led to here http://www.vsp.state.va.us/CJIS_VMEC.shtm which led to here http://www.missingkids.org/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=usMapSearch&missState=VA&searchLang=en_US&casedata=latest. This seems very odd to me as less than half of these children have pictures. If you click the link to see the poster of the child, still no picture. OP of /pol/ thread called NCMEC and asked why no photos and they stated that https://8ch.net/pol/res/10588784.html#10588962 they can't post pictures without parents/guardians permission. This seems as if it is PG related as Brian Podesta is NCMEC Senior Analyst https://archive.is/wnmLe , with a security clearance of of TOP SECRET-SENSITIVE COMPARMENTED INFORMATION. This is the highest security clearance there is. Why would this guy need security clearance that high? and at the NCMEC? WTF is this guy into? And why?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

twistedmac11 ago

Am i missing something here? You made a claim saying

I DID A CURSORY LOOK AT NCMEC POSTINGS FOR A FEW STATES AND FOUND SOME ODD THINGS which made me wonder if the pedophiles don't shop NCMEC for their kids. ARE THE NAMES OF THE KIDS MISSING IN VIRGINIA REALLY THE KID'S NAME? ARE THEY THE CONTACT PERSON'S NAME? IS THE POST JUST SO THE 'BUYERS' CAN SEE A DESCRIPTION OF THE KIDS AVAILABLE FOR SALE?

And then go on to talk about the absurd amount of missing info on kids missing from Virginia, which was covered months ago. Where's the rest of the info to back up your theory? Honestly this seems like a shill post, with a bunch of capital/bold letters, a big claim, and nothing to back it up except recycled info. Maybe I'm missing something?

DanKeyhote ago

Point out that the premise is weak if not baseless (a demand for child auction blocks), collect two downvoats.

Serves you right for raining on their circle jerk.

alanowhere ago

I have been collecting information on NCMEC for well over 6 months. They are concealing the identity of Missing Virginia children. Go to their database link below; THERE ARE NO FUCKING PICTURES. All of the other 49 states have 100% of the pictures a few have 99%

http://www.onenote.com/webapp/pages?token=2KkC-g5r381ukcwqUzuZEeArW4yUjJVleaE3mU0DAdeeb0d-9pBqlcS67Mj5Oy2vY04fhEbeKEL9ZdrhYGz-eZHog45okHcq0&id=636238389565281670

VIRGINIA HAS LESS THAN HALF THE PICTURES OF MISSING CHILDREN. THERE IS NO GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THIS

twistedmac11 ago

It just seemed like a wild question to pose and then just not follow up on it. I thought that he was going to provide more evidence to show what brought him to that possibility, but instead he went on to talk about the high rate of missing photos for kids in Virginia, which has already been covered, and never worked his original question back into the statement. It just seemed like a whole bunch of capital letters and no real information.

Commoner ago

I don't think I MADE any claims. I asked some questions about ODD things with Virginia's missing children. If you read the last bit regarding the comment made by Rachel,only yesterday, and follow the links, it says that when NCMEC was asked why there were no pics with the kids, they said that it was because some parents did not want their kids's pictures out there. Isn't it strange that all of Texas's parents are okay with it, but half of Virginia's parents are not? I found it strange that most all of the kids had names that would not be found on the TOP 100 names in the United States. I am making no claim, but IMO, that implies foreigners. And, apparently, Virginia has its own way of tracking kids. That makes me wonder about the purpose of a NATIONAL ORGANIZATION, NCMEC, if every state is going to run their own database for missing kids in their own way. And, my apologies to you and all, if this is all a rehash.

twistedmac11 ago

No apologies necessary, I apologize if I was harsh or anything. I definitely agree that the NCMEC is up to no good & that Virginia has something going on. They certainly could be using the listing on their website for nefarious things. At the minimum, their lack of diligence in keeping up the listings is potentially keeping children from being found.