You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

darkknight111 ago

OP is a known shill with the agenda of "Defend Lefitst Elites and Pedophiles". Therefore this thread is BS. Requesting a "disinformation" and/or "debunked" @vindicator @Millennial_Falcon

You never answered why you have the need to have 3+ accounts. Honest users have no need for that many. Only shills do that. If you are truly honest, then you will delete all but one of your accounts.

You always run everytime you get grilled on the Clinton Foundation's known financial involvement in the "White Phosphorous Incident". Running away when pressed is a sure sign of a shill.

You also run when pressed about those differences between a Charity Audit and a Financial Audit DarkMath kept bringing up.

Downvoat just for being a shill. Okay guys, you know what arrow to push in order to silence shills.

sunajAeon ago

How can anyone be allowed 3 accounts on Voat w/o being banned? That is DEFINITELY a RED FLAG along with the post being fantastik

Are_we__sure ago

Well you have the chance to debunk the shill if you're brave enough to take it.

This is a well researched piece that changes in a major way the theory of pizzagate. If it is wrong, please post your evidence.

DeathTooMasons ago

She kdinapped ahem...33 children. Clintons got her out. She got hired by Alert sense and changed her name. You are pathetic and not effective at what you attempt to accomplish. Do by chance know Montagraph? Another pedo personality parading as a researcher.

RweSure ago

The Clintons did not get her out. She went to trial and was convicted. The original kidnapping charges were dropped but that was a decision of the Haitian courts. They probably would not have been able to get a conviction for kidnapping because she didn't just snatch the children, but spoke to their parents and got permission.

She got hired by Alert sense and changed her name.

This has nothing to do with what the what I set out to prove here. You are misreading some defense of Silsby above. It's not there. This is what I set out to prove.

It is now proven that no evidence exists for this claim: Clinton knew Silsby for a long time

darkknight111 ago

Stop running and answer those questions that you always run from.

You just openly admitted to being a shill in that post.

Are_we__sure ago

Can't do it? I thought so.

darkknight111 ago

Still refuse to answer those questions? Thought so. I'm not going to stop pressing you until you come clean on all three questions, which is what my comment is about in the first place.

It should be obvious with a known liar and corrupt politician like Hillary that you never take what they say at face value. You always read between the lines of what they say.

These claims still do nothing to disprove the Clinton Foundation's involvement in Haiti.

Are_we__sure ago

Your comment is a big pile of Whatabboutism?

These claims still do nothing to disprove the Clinton Foundation's involvement in Haiti.

Which anyone with half a brain would grasp immediately because that's not what I'm addressing.