Are we sure does not deserve your keeping your word. He or she would turn on you or any of us in a snap. You are much too valuable in our fight to save our children. We and the children need you.
You have no concept of honor or of keeping your word. It's has nothing to do with me. LA_Trump understands this. It's about who you are as a person. If you can't accept the terms, don't agree to the offer. If he required and equal bet that I leave if Trump addressed pizzagate, I would have gladly accepted those terms.
You can't claim to be honest, if you create categories of people it's OK to lie to.
By the way, I took a similar bet and honored it in the long ago past.
"You have no concept of honor or of keeping your word."
AreWeSure coming in hot and heavy with the hypocrisy. Epic. Hey AreWeSure will you FINALLY address the issues with the Clinton Foundation vis a vis a Charity vs a Financial Audit?
This will jog your memory:
"we'll use their money to save the lives of AIDS patients"
How do you know the money goes to the AIDS patients?
I already know your answer: "Because there was a Charity Audit.". But AreWeSure a charity audit is less rigorous than a Financial Audit which has to go to ground with all the money. A Charity Audit doesn't pierce the veil of a limited partnership. If you want to keep all the money people gave Bono to help AIDS patients for yourself just create a limited partnership to hide a theft. Call it "Bono's Limited Partnership for AIDS Relief." Then keep the money and try not to laugh when the charity auditor comes around.
Charity auditor: "How much did you give to AIDS patients?".
CFO at the Limited Partnership holding back laughter: "All of it."
Charity auditor: "Ok, that's good enough for me. Thanks for your time."
Bono to CFO at the Limited Partnership: "How much of the money I raised went to AIDS relief?"
CFO at the Limited Partnership really struggling now to hold back an uncontrollable urge to laugh hysterically: "All of it."
Bono: "Great. Thanks for your time."
And done. You now have stolen 98% of the money meant for Haitian Earthquake victims AIDS patients.
AreWeSure the problem is you didn't know there are different types of audits. Well Columbia Economics Professor Jeffrey Sachs DOES know there are different types of audits. So does retired banker Charles Ortel and author Peter Schweitzer who wrote "Clinton Cash".
Do you see what's going on? At this point if you are a "Reasonable Person" you will concede this point. You will say "You know what I don't know if the money actually went to AIDS patients or Haitian Earthquake victims. I'm going to finally watch Clinton Cash to see if there is any other evidence."
But you won't do that AreWeSure because you aren't a "Reasonable Person" in the eyes of the law.
view the rest of the comments →
carmencita ago
Are we sure does not deserve your keeping your word. He or she would turn on you or any of us in a snap. You are much too valuable in our fight to save our children. We and the children need you.
Are_we_sure ago
LOL.
You have no concept of honor or of keeping your word. It's has nothing to do with me. LA_Trump understands this. It's about who you are as a person. If you can't accept the terms, don't agree to the offer. If he required and equal bet that I leave if Trump addressed pizzagate, I would have gladly accepted those terms.
You can't claim to be honest, if you create categories of people it's OK to lie to.
By the way, I took a similar bet and honored it in the long ago past.
DarkMath ago
"You have no concept of honor or of keeping your word."
AreWeSure coming in hot and heavy with the hypocrisy. Epic. Hey AreWeSure will you FINALLY address the issues with the Clinton Foundation vis a vis a Charity vs a Financial Audit?
This will jog your memory:
"we'll use their money to save the lives of AIDS patients"
How do you know the money goes to the AIDS patients?
I already know your answer: "Because there was a Charity Audit.". But AreWeSure a charity audit is less rigorous than a Financial Audit which has to go to ground with all the money. A Charity Audit doesn't pierce the veil of a limited partnership. If you want to keep all the money people gave Bono to help AIDS patients for yourself just create a limited partnership to hide a theft. Call it "Bono's Limited Partnership for AIDS Relief." Then keep the money and try not to laugh when the charity auditor comes around.
And done. You now have stolen 98% of the money meant for
Haitian Earthquake victimsAIDS patients.AreWeSure the problem is you didn't know there are different types of audits. Well Columbia Economics Professor Jeffrey Sachs DOES know there are different types of audits. So does retired banker Charles Ortel and author Peter Schweitzer who wrote "Clinton Cash".
Do you see what's going on? At this point if you are a "Reasonable Person" you will concede this point. You will say "You know what I don't know if the money actually went to AIDS patients or Haitian Earthquake victims. I'm going to finally watch Clinton Cash to see if there is any other evidence."
But you won't do that AreWeSure because you aren't a "Reasonable Person" in the eyes of the law.
:-D
@Millennial_Falcon @Dressage2 @Jangles @BlackSmith21 @Commoner
jangles ago
good comment, thanks for your contribution here.
cryptowahl ago
Talking to yourself @jangles.
jangles ago
lol