New VICE news article: "No one knows if porn is bad for you." I think there may be a child porn image on the picture that is with the article. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by abcdefg222

Article: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmmbq9/no-one-knows-if-porn-is-bad-for-you

I was unable to archive. I keep getting error messages.

Anyway... I'd never heard of VICE news. It airs on HBO and they just did a hugely popular video regarding the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville which is what introduces me to it. I was just glancing at their articles on their facebook feed and I came across this article. I haven't read it, but I was taken back by the photo accompanying the article. There are different blurred porno images and one looks like child porn. I can't tell for sure, but isn't that a young child that the women is holding in the picture that is in the 4th row from the left and the 4th row down.

Am I crazy? That looks like a child and I want to call them out but wanting to get another opinion. It is blurry so maybe I'm looking at it wrong?

This is related to pizzagate do to the possible connection to child abuse/child porn.

Per the article: Image by Lia Kantrowitz

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

paulf ago

Unquestionably a child. The ratio of head to body is that of a toddler. The child's arm proportions are much smaller than that of the woman as is its right hand. Repulsive.

Image by Lia Kantrowitz

Every. Fucking. Time.

mrnobu ago

OK. Gotta jump in here. I come on Voat every single day and am VERY impressed with 99% of the research done here and I've spent the last 10 months of my life convincing EVERYONE I know that the concepts researched and discussed here are REAL and VALID.

BUT, Lia is a childhood friend of mine, and is simply a graphic designer at VICE. NOT A PEDOPHILE.

So, let's take a step back and stop jumping to conclusions. It is important not to just assume things. I'm not saying VICE as a publication is innocent - they're owned by NEWSCORP aka MURDOCH, but let's focus on the EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS and EDITORS rather than the JOURNALISTS and GRAPHIC DESIGNERS.

With that being said - SOURCES:

That's not a Child. That is an image from another Vice Article which is a SCREENSHOT FROM PORNHUB - https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7akb7/this-24-year-old-japanese-porn-star-looks-like-a-child The 'Porn Star's' Name is Nishikun, and he's 24 years old. https://video-images.vice.com/_uncategorized/1495010507714-16463596_1321512511225648_2664278387973037186_o.jpeg?resize=1575:*

This doesn't mean VICE is innocent - I think it is strange and very suspect to push an article that depicts Japan's pedophile fetish and puts a small man on a pedestal for pretending to be a child in porn films - but then again it did get a lot of attention in media because at this point it's been normalized.

paulf ago

BUT, Lia is a childhood friend of mine, and is simply a graphic designer at VICE. NOT A PEDOPHILE.

Proof or GTFO.

So, let's take a step back and stop jumping to conclusions. It is important not to just assume things. I'm not saying VICE as a publication is innocent - they're owned by NEWSCORP aka MURDOCH, but let's focus on the EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS and EDITORS rather than the JOURNALISTS and GRAPHIC DESIGNERS.

ACTUALLY we'll go after ANYONE complicit in the normalization of the ABUSE OF CHILDREN and don't need ADVICE on HOW TO CONDUCT our research.

The 'Porn Star's' Name is Nishikun, and he's 24 years old.

So while browsing a bunch of porn images for her collage, Lia carefully selected the one that looks like a child and included it.

This doesn't mean VICE is innocent - I think it is strange and very suspect to push an article that depicts Japan's pedophile fetish and puts a small man on a pedestal for pretending to be a child in porn films - but then again it did get a lot of attention in media because at this point it's been normalized.

It's been normalized. I wonder (((who)) could be behind that?

mrnobu ago

Calm the fuck down. I dont need proof that im friends with the graphic desiner mentioned. The image is from porn hub, it was selected for a DIFFERENT vice article, and she accessed it thru their archives to make a mini graphic. Im not the fucking one to be challenging on something so fuckin minor. I just came here to tell you all that the graphics person who did this article isnt a fuckin pedophile.