You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SterlingJB ago

I read this article yesterday. The way they described the Exeter story made Blaine seem completely innocent. I mean, there's an accuser and a gigantic box of child porn yet they're making him out to be the victim? Then there's this quote:

He lived in a dorm for 10 years and there were kids walking in and out of his room late at night in their underwear. If he ever had a chance to do something with a kid, Exeter was it. But that's not Lane', according to a close friend

From this quote it sure seems like there should have been a broader investigation yet the writer uses it as support for why the charges were just the fantasy of a begrudged student. Exeter was indeed it, anon close friend, and maybe, since the guy had a box of kiddie porn under his bed while having kids come into his bedroom in their underwear for 10 years, that was indeed Lane.