You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

"This term has been heavily investigated and speculated about and what it could mean to the Pizzagate investigation."

That it has. And for what? Zero arrests. The Podesta emails have occupied us for 9 months and have lead to NOTHING.

Wikileaks is a CIA limited hangout and the Podesta emails were released by Wikileaks one month before the election.

Conclusion: the CIA released the Podesta emails.

Why?

1) To shit can Her Thighness

2) Distract from far worse crimes evidence of which we'll never see because they don't want us to see it.

Wake Up People!

The crimes are real but do you really think the CIA would release evidence that would lead to arrests?

[Insert N word] please. Don't be a chump.

:-D

HugoWeaving ago

While I happen to agree with your point generally, it is important to remember that Wikileaks was not compromised until AFTER they released the emails. It is believed by many, of course, that CIA now runs the title shop. And on that I happen to also agree. But at the time the emails were released, we may be able to assume JA was still at the helm. They got him right after. In retaliation for the release most likely.

DarkMath ago

"Wikileaks was not compromised until AFTER they released the emails."

That's what I thought too but then I figured out the litmus test for detecting limited hang outs:

Was 9/11 an inside job?

That's all you need to decode Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. Both think 9/11 was carried out by 19 Arab "terrorists" 10 of who are still alive bee tee dubs.

O_O

HugoWeaving ago

An interesting idea, yes. And worth exploring. As part of that very narrative, might I propose that JA and ES actually agree with you. Here's the logic: If 9/11 was an inside job, it's still a job meaning you need to hire employees to perform services for you. Sure, the resumes of 19 Arab "terrorists" may have been hidden in Bush's bottom drawer and JA/ES may have known it, but that does not make Wikileaks, its supporters or it's source material questionable. The ideas are not mutually-exclusive.

9/11 was carried out by terrorists, just not the ones everyone thinks.

DarkMath ago

That a distinction without a difference. The point is JA, Wikileaks and ES are CIA. Of course there's going to be juicy information they release. It's just not the real dirty dirt.