You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DonKeyhote ago

  1. All such speculating is masturbation and only complicates things further for newbs.

  2. If were spitballing like losers, hows this: all/most the wikileaks dumps over the years contain emails we find PG clues in. If PG was meant to be revealed in 2016 how would they know that some MAGA teenagers would spot the codewords but, say, Hollywood reporters wouldnt in the Sony or Stratfor emails released years prior?

Perhaps Assange is indeed a cult survivor on the good side.

As for Trump his Jewish ties make it an open and shut case. From: "Fred Burton" burton@stratfor.com To: "Bayless Parsley" bayless.parsley@stratfor.com Cc: "Analyst List" analysts@stratfor.com, "CT AOR" ct@stratfor.com Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:09:57 AM GMT -06:00 Central America Subject: Barack Obama rewards big donors with plum jobs overseas

Bayless - As discussed yesterday, about pressure, competing interests and politics of foreign policy. Most US Ambassadors (like most Presidents) never really have to make a decision.

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/17/1738514_re-barack-obama-rewards-big-donors-with-plum-jobs-overseas-.html

Judgejewdy ago

You're right about the speculatory masturbation, anyway. And the fact that there are now two new people who want us to believe all the evidence posted in the sticky and beyond is just a convenient fantasy. It's gaslighting of the highest order and, frankly, insulting. Time to move away from this bs thread and continue with the real work.