As for David Bottrill being ASIO.... This is very suggestive of that fact. The court transcripts can only be censored for national security. If he was regular immigration staff like his cover job - details of his overseas postings wouldn't be censored out of the transcript and A FULL FEE REFUND DONE FOR THE $2 grand transcription to get out of REDACTING THE TRANSCRIPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY REASON.
The OTOAustralia org au child sex cult's leadership is ASIO. Explain another reason why they have the power to redact transcripts, unless the judge is a kiddy fiddler. With 4 tapes recording in parallell it has to be a pretty big cock up to be a "technical failure" with a clerk paid to look at the VU meters.
- Mr Botrill, treasurer of the Ordo Templi Orientis, Inc. revealed, " I - I - I represent Australia overseas on diplomatic postings ..." with a top-secret security clearance. We are not at all surprised to hear this given that the accumulating evidence consistently points to protection of this blood-thirsty religion by people in high places. Perhaps this is the opportunity to mention the near treetop level fighter jet which shook our concrete house and terrorised the wildlife on its northerly pass over our house and then again on its return trip, distinctly marking our first webpage exposé and reaction to the OTO's initiation of its first legal moves against us. No. Jets don't do that around here, and no, there were no other occasions, although when we first wrote to the National Security Hotline there was that low-flying, black, unmarked military helicopter. Clearly our work is not so embarrassing that they can simply laugh it off.
- Mr King, Chief Executive Officer of the OTO, Inc. revealed that he is a volunteer tutor at Darlington Public School working with disadvantaged children. "He works with disadvantaged children trying to offset some of the damage that these people have incurred." Remember OTO Prophet Aleister Crowley's explanations about any sexual act at all with whomever...See excerpt regarding children further down this page.
- Mr King revealed that the Victorian police downloaded OTO web pages, in response to our report of their annual general meeting (in which various bloody rites were to be "performed".) This is a significant revelation, considering the police have apparently consistently resisted acknowledging any need to investigate the OTO in light of independent reports from victims of terrible abuse which correspond to "satanic" rituals described in the OTO's own published religious texts and documents. King seems to claim that the OTO liaised with the Victorian police for fear of public reprisals due to our exposé and that the police played some kind of protective role for the OTO. (Sounds familiar)
- They reveal that their ultimate goal is to have this website shut down.
- They reveal that membership with the OTO has been detrimentally effected by our exposé, as has revenue and attendance at the annual general meeting.
- They suggested that they were forced to alter their webpage as a result of our exposé. However they did not tell the judge that what they removed, among other things, was the page named "... righttokill.htm " in which they had presented verses from one of their rituals which asserts that man has a right to write what he will, eat what he will, etc, etc...Man has a right to kill those who would thwart him. And they also removed the erect penis .gif (left) with the 666 beneath it which accompanied the aforementioned verse. And also they removed their copy of their prime religious text which outlines the law of Thelema which, despite what the OTO says, promotes revenge, torture, lust, ritual sacrifice and all those other horrors we have previously outlined.
6th December 2005 - The extra part of the transcript which was sent to us on the 28th November (coincidentally the day of the latest Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearing involving us) revealed that the OTO National Treasurer described the OTO for the Magistrate thus: "...the objects of the association are the promotion of the religion of Thelema and Thelemic culture as we describe it, you know, sort of artistic endeavours by persons of that religious persuasion."
- OTO Inc. solicitor Moerkerke asserted that we have made no attempts at research. I guess they haven't read our web site, after all. I suppose the judge didn't tell him that we also provided the court with a CD of 2954 files about the OTO. If you haven't seen the following already, please do read our "embarrassing", "there's been no attempts at research" response to the court, as well as this "Compassion is the Vice of Kings - Mark 2" article and this letter we wrote to Premier Bracks, the Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria and the Attorney General of Victoria for starters. All are already linked in above section as well.
- They falsely asserted that we alleged that several murders were going to take place at the OTO AGM. We said they "may" take place, judging by the OTO's own material which already exists on the internet.
- They refer to a presentation we apparently made which they interpreted as a veiled threat. For the record. All of our presentations have been for the purpose of exposing the criminality of this situation and seeking humane rectification thereof. Although we have certainly expressed views that the OTO are in (self- induced) strife because of their own activities and may face public retribution, and because we do expect their will be repercussions due to their own actions, we never threatened them with any inhumane retribution as they suggest, nor do we condone such acts. We do however, sincerely urge them to finally comprehend the grave harm, both social and spiritual, they do to themselves as well as others as they continue to pursue this dangerous course.
Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine
775 Upper Coldstream Road
Tyndale NSW 2460
[email protected]
www.gaiaguys.net
5th December 2005
ref: 051123
CS05/50689
re:transcript
- file number discrepancy, missing section and "truth" replaced with "proof".
Dear Registrar,
We have received from your office, dated 28th November 2005, a transcript and an audio tape of the court session no. 50689 of 2005 at 11.23 AM, Tuesday, 28th June 2005, as requested. However there are discrepancies between the two. The most outstanding discrepancy we have noticed is in the case number noted on the last page. In the audio recording the number is clearly 50689, as you would expect, but in the transcript it is noted as 57789. Please explain how this came to be.
A further point for which we require explanation concerns the missing section. We are rather puzzled that following our request to your transcript clerk for the complete transcript (having first received an incomplete transcript by email on 7th November), we received this current version of the transcript which contained a section not on the audio tape.
Also, according to that transcript there is still a section missing. It reads,
"(Audio stops at 2.12.54)
35 RESUMED [2.49 pm]:"
Please can you explain why there was a break at that point or why that section of the hearing has not been recorded?
Our third point concerns the transcriber's error in recording the word "truth" as "proof". Although the words are similar sounding the word "truth" can be distinctly discerned on the audio tape. Also, we have noticed that when his Honour says, "We can't give you any more than you asked for." it was transcribed as "Don't you mean more than you've asked for?"
Although these latter points may not be hugely significant in legal terms it is clearly important to note the inaccuracies considering the Ordo Templi Orientis members have indicated their intention to launch further proceedings against us which will, no doubt, be based on this extraordinary hearing of the 28th of June (in which our defence was struck out as "embarrassing").
Thank you for your attention to this matter and we look forward to receiving a correction from your office of the above points as well as an explanation for the discrepancies. Considering that legal action, seeking damages, has also been taken against us by the Ordo Templi Orientis through the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (last directions hearing the 28th November 2005) you will appreciate the need to clear these matters up.
We will forward the remaining amount owing for the transcript and tape on receipt of the corrected and complete transcript.
Sincerely,
Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine
(Copy to follow by ordinary mail.)
...........................................................................................................................................................
Attached is the transcript again with the mistakes amended. however we have not been able to recover the missing piece of audio. We must have had a system problem that day and an error message is preventing us from retrieving the audio.
Sorry for the inconvenience. The Registrar has waived the remainder of the transcript fees.
view the rest of the comments →
hojuruku ago
As for David Bottrill being ASIO.... This is very suggestive of that fact. The court transcripts can only be censored for national security. If he was regular immigration staff like his cover job - details of his overseas postings wouldn't be censored out of the transcript and A FULL FEE REFUND DONE FOR THE $2 grand transcription to get out of REDACTING THE TRANSCRIPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY REASON.
The OTOAustralia org au child sex cult's leadership is ASIO. Explain another reason why they have the power to redact transcripts, unless the judge is a kiddy fiddler. With 4 tapes recording in parallell it has to be a pretty big cock up to be a "technical failure" with a clerk paid to look at the VU meters.
http://www.theyfly.com/articles/gaia/oto.actjudgement.htm
..........................................
From: "gaiaguysnet" gaiaguys@gaiaguys.net To: court.mct.transcripts@act.gov.au; "Perkins, Felicity" Felicity.Perkins@act.gov.au Subject: transcript file number discrepancy, missing section Date: Monday, 5 December 2005 3:24 PM
Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine 775 Upper Coldstream Road Tyndale NSW 2460 [email protected] www.gaiaguys.net 5th December 2005
ref: 051123 CS05/50689
re:transcript - file number discrepancy, missing section and "truth" replaced with "proof".
Dear Registrar,
We have received from your office, dated 28th November 2005, a transcript and an audio tape of the court session no. 50689 of 2005 at 11.23 AM, Tuesday, 28th June 2005, as requested. However there are discrepancies between the two. The most outstanding discrepancy we have noticed is in the case number noted on the last page. In the audio recording the number is clearly 50689, as you would expect, but in the transcript it is noted as 57789. Please explain how this came to be.
A further point for which we require explanation concerns the missing section. We are rather puzzled that following our request to your transcript clerk for the complete transcript (having first received an incomplete transcript by email on 7th November), we received this current version of the transcript which contained a section not on the audio tape.
Also, according to that transcript there is still a section missing. It reads,
"(Audio stops at 2.12.54)
35 RESUMED [2.49 pm]:"
Please can you explain why there was a break at that point or why that section of the hearing has not been recorded?
Our third point concerns the transcriber's error in recording the word "truth" as "proof". Although the words are similar sounding the word "truth" can be distinctly discerned on the audio tape. Also, we have noticed that when his Honour says, "We can't give you any more than you asked for." it was transcribed as "Don't you mean more than you've asked for?"
Although these latter points may not be hugely significant in legal terms it is clearly important to note the inaccuracies considering the Ordo Templi Orientis members have indicated their intention to launch further proceedings against us which will, no doubt, be based on this extraordinary hearing of the 28th of June (in which our defence was struck out as "embarrassing").
Thank you for your attention to this matter and we look forward to receiving a correction from your office of the above points as well as an explanation for the discrepancies. Considering that legal action, seeking damages, has also been taken against us by the Ordo Templi Orientis through the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (last directions hearing the 28th November 2005) you will appreciate the need to clear these matters up.
We will forward the remaining amount owing for the transcript and tape on receipt of the corrected and complete transcript.
Sincerely,
Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine
(Copy to follow by ordinary mail.) ...........................................................................................................................................................
From: "Perkins, Felicity" Felicity.Perkins@act.gov.au To: gaiaguys@gaiaguys.net Subject: Ordo Templi -v- Devine Date: Thursday, 22 December 2005 8:46 AM
Attached is the transcript again with the mistakes amended. however we have not been able to recover the missing piece of audio. We must have had a system problem that day and an error message is preventing us from retrieving the audio.
Sorry for the inconvenience. The Registrar has waived the remainder of the transcript fees.
Regards,
Felicity Perkins Transcript Clerk ACT Law Courts Phone: 02 6217 4372 Fax: 02 06217 4509 Email: [email protected]