You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

10085228? ago

I don't know if this answers your question, but right now I'm backing off of researching and focusing on reading Maury Terry's book The Ultimate Evil to hopefully get more insight into the Cabal. The book is free online.

On the back cover where it says Process Church in his theory, I think of it as the Process Church is MI6 and CIA: Screen capture

Link to the book online:

  • (banned domain) https://docs (dot) google (dot) com/file/d/0BwZL_QI2UVrbZWlqV2JKRExSSHc/edit

I found it hard to scroll through the Google Drive file so I bought the Kindle version.

 

Here are excerpts from the Introduction (from the later Kindle version):

The trail [of "a perilous investigative odyssey" that began with the author's skepticism of Berkowitz's claim of sole culpability] led from the hushed silence of a church in Palo Alto, California, to the mansions of Beverly Hills, and from the golden wheat fields of North Dakota to the posh decadence of Long Island’s Hamptons and the squalor of a half-dozen prisons.

However, this is not a Son of Sam story. On the surface is the enigmatic David Berkowitz, but far below is an infinitely more frightening specter— a highly motivated and well-organized cult group whose various criminal enterprises included the .44 [Son of Sam] homicides. While using the trappings of the occult, the group’s main goals were power, greed and terrorism. It is the embodiment of organized evil, and it still stains America on the eve of the millennium. It has thrived because its tentacles ensnared a number of jaded allies whose influential positions enabled it to extend far beyond New York.

But beneath the contemporary veneer, it remains what it always was: a well- connected criminal cabal which some authorities today regard as “active and dangerous” because they believe it is presently aligned with a number of incendiary U.S. hate groups, radical movements and militias.

To understand why the Son of Sam and other related killings happened and how those ultimately the most responsible for them managed to continue their operations to the present day, it is perhaps beneficial to pose a few questions. Did the government deceive the public about Vietnam, Watergate and Iran-Contra? It did. Did the government fatally fumble the 1993 standoff at the Branch-Davidian compound in Waco, Texas? It did. Was the FBI implicated in a cover-up in the 1992 shooting deaths of the wife and son of separatist Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho— and was it later blamed for also botching the 1996 bombing case at the Atlanta Olympics? It was.

In general terms, have so-called servants of the public misled that same public about a host of other misdeeds on national, state and local levels over the course of many decades? They have. And do deceptions, cover-ups and blatant bureaucratic ineffectiveness continue to incubate in various forms throughout the United States today? They certainly do.

It also shows that events were manipulated behind the scenes by a handful of influential individuals who, although not directly involved in the [Son of Sam] shootings themselves, were compromised because they had interacted with cult leaders at high-society drug parties that featured sex with children.

I don't know yet if Maury Terry's theory will help us. But I have a feeling he was on the right track.

Maurice Terry (1946-2015) Rest in Peace

Votescam ago

Would just add that there is a Charles Manson segment in a program tonight I noted as I passed by which I think is called "Manson: The Prison Tapes" but part of a series called something like "Murder made me famous." It seems obvious that the intent is to use it to help build up public fear, but again -- like "Son of Sam" - these are two false flag events to mislead the public.

In the case of David Berkowitz, he had volunteered for enlistment in Vietnam but eventually began to see the lies of the war and he was indeed a conscience objector. Berkowitz was held in military prison and believed to have been under strong pressure to deny his status as a conscientious objector. Vietnam was of course, "The Bright Shining Lie" and "The Gulf of Tonkin Incident" was one more false flag event. The fervor for war and Empire certainly ran through Vietnam with an intensity which certainly wasn't going to permit "conscientious objectors" to take hold, either of the mind of the public nor to confirm for other soldiers that their doubts were real, nor to give them hope that there may be a way out serving in support of the war and its evil and murderous programs.

It also shows that events were manipulated behind the scenes by a handful of influential individuals who, although not directly involved in the [Son of Sam] shootings themselves, were compromised because they had interacted with cult leaders at high-society drug parties that featured sex with children.

I do think it's very important however to make clear that "Satan" and the "Devil" do not exist except in the minds of male-supremacists who invented them to frighten the public and those they wish to control.

Not that the violence by these men pushing these "Satanic" rituals isn't real ... They are very much real and they have produced very many victims.

Spirit and spirituality are quite different from organized patriarchal religions/male-supremacist religions. It's a difference of wisdom and enlightenment from within/conscience versus the idea of middle-men/priests who dictate to members what they should think and what they should do. Once putting members under control, controlling all of society is the next step. And that has always required that male-supremacist religions have great influence over government.

SavedbyJCfromRSA_MK ago

I do think it's very important however to make clear that "Satan" and the "Devil" do not exist except in the minds of male-supremacists who invented them to frighten the public and those they wish to control.

The "male-supremacists", you got that so right, are bored with their own rituals. They do it in a routine fashion, a necessary preliminary to the real event. It's the glue that they use to explain the abuse about to occur to themselves, Cognitive dissonance requires this mental shift. They hypnotize themselves, with robes, candles and masks. They do succeed in bring out a devil but it's from within themselves, not an exterior presence. Even at high level masonic rituals, the Molock figure with the oversized member, has a ordinary man hidden within it. Most in attendance don't realize that.