whaaaat? don't be stupid. the sub is not for the murder of kids, if some sick fucks posted it, it should go. but that place has way more than that and most of it is suicides or nigger accidents
Well it's a sick fascination. Why can't you believe that people on voat of all places are calling for things to be banned? Just because we are in voat, doesn't mean we are subscribed to sick morbid subs. That comment makes no sense.
Because Voat is meant to be a bastion of free speech. Watching kids get stabbed is not my cup of tea either, but it's not illegal and I will defend their right to watch it.
It just seems like that's something you would find on the darknet. Either way, the ARE showing kids. What about the animals being abused and the beastiality? Would that be under your free speech category that you defend? Watching kids may not be your cup of tea, but it's there. You still defend it? Do you defend child porn? Maybe a poster or seller of child porn is someone that never hurt children, but just likes to watch the videos or their pictures? Should they be allowed?
view the rest of the comments →
10000-20000 ago
whaaaat? don't be stupid. the sub is not for the murder of kids, if some sick fucks posted it, it should go. but that place has way more than that and most of it is suicides or nigger accidents
srayzie ago
You're sick
AceToMouth ago
They're not celebrating people dying, especially not kids. Some people have a morbid fascination with death. They're not snuff films.
I can't believe people on Voat of all places are calling for things to be banned.
srayzie ago
Well it's a sick fascination. Why can't you believe that people on voat of all places are calling for things to be banned? Just because we are in voat, doesn't mean we are subscribed to sick morbid subs. That comment makes no sense.
AceToMouth ago
Because Voat is meant to be a bastion of free speech. Watching kids get stabbed is not my cup of tea either, but it's not illegal and I will defend their right to watch it.
srayzie ago
It just seems like that's something you would find on the darknet. Either way, the ARE showing kids. What about the animals being abused and the beastiality? Would that be under your free speech category that you defend? Watching kids may not be your cup of tea, but it's there. You still defend it? Do you defend child porn? Maybe a poster or seller of child porn is someone that never hurt children, but just likes to watch the videos or their pictures? Should they be allowed?
Where does free speech cross the line for you?