I'd also like to point out that today as of this comment, there are SEVEN STORIES 4 TO 5 MONTHS OLD coming up on the default front page as HOT - they can't even be commented on anymore! C'mon folks running Voat, you really think that looks reasonable?
5 month old stories are not HOT. Clearly manipulation is involved, or the coders at Voat are the worst coders in the forum world without even remedial skills. I don't think that is the case.
What the hell I am talking about was what the HOT page looked like at the time I commented and for an hour before and after Not my main point so if you don't believe me without a screenshot no problem.
Why do I care someone accusing voat of being compromised, insane shadowban conspiracies, bad mod etc? Because simple evidence can prove your claims but you have none. That calls into question your entire post.
HA RIGHT as to the rest of it I would say nice try but it's not really that good. anyone here for real information will look at the article I have well sourced and written vs. your two Voat defenses and decide for themselves. I make note of the phenomena I see on the HOT page for those here who know me and who I know so we can compare notes. That's it.
Would you chill out? This isn't my only account. You've posted good content before but if you cant take a simple criticism of one aspect... jeez.
Edit also anyone who has been around voat for awhile knows why they stopped allowing votes on old content. It was specifically to stop shills from making a ton of alts and downvoting one persons old submissions
Also calling the entire 20 page article into question because I note in a sentence or two some problems on the front page of voat is worthy of scorn, so if you are going to throw that nonsense around, expect pushback
Ok sorry for that.Bad assumption on my part. It was front you were talking about? I thought you meant "default" hot of /v/pizzagate not of the frontpage
Even sorting by that, oldest post on first 2 pages is 16hrs. So I still dont understand what you saw. Were you looking at "hot" including subverses you have subscribed to (and possibly unsubbed from default subverses?)
again at the time of this comment there are 4 threads at the bottom of HOT on pizzagate subverse that are 4 and 5 months old. These are not hot topics.
view the rest of the comments →
VieBleu ago
I'd also like to point out that today as of this comment, there are SEVEN STORIES 4 TO 5 MONTHS OLD coming up on the default front page as HOT - they can't even be commented on anymore! C'mon folks running Voat, you really think that looks reasonable?
5 month old stories are not HOT. Clearly manipulation is involved, or the coders at Voat are the worst coders in the forum world without even remedial skills. I don't think that is the case.
CeepsNo ago
Screenshot? Everything I see when sorting by "hot" even on default front page is recent.
What the hell are you talking about?
VieBleu ago
What the hell I am talking about was what the HOT page looked like at the time I commented and for an hour before and after Not my main point so if you don't believe me without a screenshot no problem.
CeepsNo ago
With public modlogs can you substantiate anything?
VieBleu ago
huh? why do you care? go read something longer than a comic strip.
CeepsNo ago
Why do I care someone accusing voat of being compromised, insane shadowban conspiracies, bad mod etc? Because simple evidence can prove your claims but you have none. That calls into question your entire post.
VieBleu ago
not blaming the mods.
HA RIGHT as to the rest of it I would say nice try but it's not really that good. anyone here for real information will look at the article I have well sourced and written vs. your two Voat defenses and decide for themselves. I make note of the phenomena I see on the HOT page for those here who know me and who I know so we can compare notes. That's it.
CeepsNo ago
Would you chill out? This isn't my only account. You've posted good content before but if you cant take a simple criticism of one aspect... jeez.
Edit also anyone who has been around voat for awhile knows why they stopped allowing votes on old content. It was specifically to stop shills from making a ton of alts and downvoting one persons old submissions
VieBleu ago
Also calling the entire 20 page article into question because I note in a sentence or two some problems on the front page of voat is worthy of scorn, so if you are going to throw that nonsense around, expect pushback
CeepsNo ago
Ok sorry for that.Bad assumption on my part. It was front you were talking about? I thought you meant "default" hot of /v/pizzagate not of the frontpage
Even sorting by that, oldest post on first 2 pages is 16hrs. So I still dont understand what you saw. Were you looking at "hot" including subverses you have subscribed to (and possibly unsubbed from default subverses?)
VieBleu ago
again at the time of this comment there are 4 threads at the bottom of HOT on pizzagate subverse that are 4 and 5 months old. These are not hot topics.