(Mods please remove the other similarly named post if you wish, it posted by accident before completion - thank you.)
In our ongoing pizzagate discussion on this forum, we often notice strange tamperings going on. Fairly often lately there are posts months old suddenly showing up on the "Hot" section of the front page, with no new comments added.
In the same fashion, I noticed that this post, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1956145 made less than a day ago and receiving the same amount of moderate traffic that a majority of posts received at that time, has completely disappeared from the "Hot" section (the default section that is brought up when landing on the site).
I mean, as of the moment of this posting, it has completely DISAPPEARED from the entire "Hot" section - pages and pages back. This has never happened before to any one of my 47 posts.
Here is the headline - The Empire Strikes Back - Model Reversal of SRA/Pizzagate Type Convictions - New DA In Texas Leads The Charge with New "Conviction Integrity Unit
Notice that our fave CIA rep AreWeSure has jumped all over the post like white on rice, plus has a buddy doing back up ad hominem on me.
I must add, the "Conviction Integrity Unit" is about as laughably Orwellian as it gets. C'mon guys, if you want to do this quietly, don't punk us with names like this and expect some eyebrows to not lift a bit skywards.
But the serious question remains - why so much effort to hide this line of inquirey and to quash it? Surely there is room for civilized discourse regarding this development?
Text of the original post in question:
-It appears that if a new DA comes in and says the crime didn't happen, it didn't happen. "The exoneration is the first for the nascent conviction integrity unit of the Travis County District Attorney’s Office under the new DA, Margaret Moore."
-Doctor that gave testimony of physical evidence of 3 year old girl's vaginal rape went to a conference and learned that what he saw wasn't what he saw - there are new styles of vagina now.
-The case has all the hallmarks of what we are investigating every day - "The Kellers had sacrificed babies; they held ceremonies in a local graveyard; they put blood in the children’s Kool-Aid; Fran cut off the arm of a gorilla in a local park; they flew the children to Mexico to be sexually assaulted by military officials." All of which was proven to be true to Austin officials, but now is no longer true, in part because the orginal report "was an ALL-CAPS, run-on-sentence fever dream full of breathless accusations..." and local citizens were accused of being in on it.
-Use the words "Satanic Panic" and the events, child's testimony and physical evidence is all laughable rubbish.
-The "victims" of the Satanic Panic will recieve millions in compensation from the state, effectively muzzling the atmosphere of law enforcement investigations into SRA and pedophilia incidents for fear of reprisal, mockery and institutionally programed failure.
The original Austin Police Department report: https://www.austinchronicle.com/media/content/759211/apdkellerreport.pdf
The article:https://theintercept.com/2017/06/20/texas-couple-exonerated-25-years-after-being-convicted-of-lurid-crimes-that-never-happened/
I'm sorry to see The Intercept purveying the message on behalf of elites that the hysterically named "Satanic Panic" is a legit social phenomenon, but SRA and pedogate abuse is questionable at the very least. I certainly hope the survivors in this case are able to fight this - perhaps we can do something to support them.>
view the rest of the comments →
VieBleu ago
Interesting bit here, from another article about this DA review and release -
"After the review hearing, the new DA was convinced the Keller’s trial had not been fair and they were released just before Christmas. She had no intention of putting them back on trial but could not justify to herself to exonerate them without evidence to prove no crime ever happened. That is virtually impossible to accomplish. Between Dr. Mouw, Jordan Smith, and Keith Hampton, who is an attorney that worked without pay for more than six years, the Kellers names have been cleared and they are free to rebuild what they can of their shattered lives.
https://conservativedailypost.com/couple-cleared-of-creepy-daycare-charges-after-25-years/
I'd like to know more about this attorney that worked without pay for 6 years - how exactly does he make a living would be one. Who does he know, and how did they find him? Who else does he represent?
this may be him - Keith Hampton, legislative director of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers, also served as President of the organization in 2011. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2Y5uVpgC4LUJ:www.voiceforthedefenseonline.com/newsletters/2010/Apr10.pdf+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=nz
Why was it so important to Keith Hampton to whittle away at this case until he could overturn it? Is he a crusader against a "panic" from a quarter century ago? Why? Aren't there plenty of recent police brutality, shootings, immigration cases and civil rights violation cases in Texas that are more relevant to today's world? Especially since there is supposed to be nothing to all this pizzagate stuff anyway, right?
Factfinder2 ago
Check out Keith Hampton's website with a promo for "Southwest of Salem," an Investigation Discovery film involving some of his "best work" about four girls who were accused of satanic sexual child abuse: http://www.keithshamptonlaw.com/ It also mentions that more of his work will be included in a documentary on the Kellers. Here is "Southwest of Salem": https://www.investigationdiscovery.com/tv-shows/southwest-of-salem/ Here is info about a Keller documentary but not sure if it's the one referred to on Hampton's website: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4087350/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl Also see: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4087350/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl The NY Times review of "Southwest of Salem" says it is shown as a cause for the Innocence Project of Texas and for Debbie Nathan, a journalist also seen in “Capturing the Friedmans,” a film about a Long Island family caught up in sexual-abuse allegations: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/16/movies/southwest-of-salem-review.html Innocence Project of Texas probably has its fingerprints all over Keith Hampton's crusade to protect satanic abusers. His work is not confined to Texas, though, so we need to find out whose else's deep pockets might also also be funding him. It's worth keeping Debbie Nathan in mind as a person of interest too if she's an apologist for abusers. Here is info about "Capturing the Friedmans": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capturing_the_Friedmans Doesn't sound like there was a satanic element in that case.
VieBleu ago
Here is one respected critic of Nathan and the organization she is wedded to which aides and abets pedos slip from justice - the NCRJ.
http://blogs.brown.edu/rcheit/
He has a very meticulously written book on how the "Witch-Hunt Narrative" is made up by those trying to destroy the credible evidence of several important SRA cases and pedo apologists. He also speaks frequently with child protection committees and law enforcement. Glad he is out there.
Factfinder2 ago
So glad you found this. It's nice to know someone of this caliber is naming names and following up.