You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

GuannaRue ago

Dear OP @V____Z

  1. You make multiple posts re: george webb.

  2. It is then established that George webb is a disinformation agent.

  3. You continue to post about George webb (confirmed controlled opposition).

  4. You are reminded multiple times that George webb is disinfo.

  5. You continue to post about George webb (confirmed controlled opposition).

  6. You are an obvious shill.

  7. The End.

trueringstrue ago

This is an honest question ok? I am fairly new here.

What would V___Z be trying to accomplish now?

I got the message over a month ago about Webb. Do you have any ideas?

I can't see an upside. Unless op feels a need to keep Webb et al in the spotlight?

GuannaRue ago

In my opinion, OP @V____Z is likely paid to come here on voat and spread seeds of disinformation to distract honest researchers from legitimate leads.

20Justice4All17 ago

You're not the only one: VZ, Done, horse lover, DeGre....all act like shills

equineluvr ago

Nope. It's called VETTING SOURCES, and it's an important element of ANY "investigation."

You idiots either don't know how to do it, don't care about it, are so ENAMORED with Webb's bullshit role that you don't want to see the truth, or you're on someone's payroll. Perhaps a combination of these.

Either way, you're not interested in TRUTH so should be completely IGNORED.

Silverlining ago

So glad to be a fool, if you're the smart one!

20Justice4All17 ago

I see GW for what he is. He is not hiding it. You think Pizzagate just happened by accident? There are tons of intelligence agencies around the world with various motives that are sick of the level of deprevity being pushed out of Washington into the rest of the world. Just because this source doesn't completely align with your vetting requirements doesn't mean he isn't legit and bringing legitimate evidence of this evil to light. His approach seems more pragmatic than what we want to see here but that doesn't mean what he has revealed should be disregarded. I have taken a balanced approach to GW and am willing to cede you and others many points on 'specific' pieces of info that are legitimitely refutable. I'm also willing to cede you and others his motives don't align with this board.
I am not willing to listen to you and others completely discredit his findings because that is a disservice to this board and people on here looking for answers. That is the difference between me and the others who gang up on GW. That is why you all sound like shills and I don't.

Silverlining ago

V____Z ago

OR, Webb has an online team of trolls to manufacture either support for him, and/or support for his detractors. These people have 10 day old accounts.