He did not rape a baby. He had child porn images. In light of that, this bail amount is appropriate. A lot of people have images of criminal acts and we don't act like they actually committed the act themselves unless there is evidence.
You're just getting swept up in this mob mentality witch hunt that is pizzagate. Yes, child porn and exploitation is bad. Totally horrible and wrong. But having pictures of something horrible is not the same as committing the act, and the punishment should fit the crime.
It is the same. It's sexual gratification taken from the abusive torture of a child. Or in this case, a 6 month old baby.
It''s ruining the life of another human being, a defenseless baby, for the purpose of an adult's sexual arousal.
How you're unable to comprehend that is astounding.
I hope someone video tapes your torture. I hope it's sold for the pleasure of other's viewing and you're victimizatiin is forever recorded. I hope people get off to it to such an extent, you're hunted like a fucking animal and abused again. I hope whoever does actually commit the assault is paid a shit ton of money off of your suffering, over and over and over.
There are various levels of involvement in a crime. Of course he sounds like a sick pervert viewing and having images of CP. If he directly paid money for it I consider that far worse. And actually physically raping a child (as the title here misleadingly implies) would of obviously deserve the worst punishment.
How do you know he even paid any money for it? You sound like a hysterical moron. It's a good thing retards like you are not in charge of actual criminal investigations. Instead you just sit around and talk tough on the internet.
you're a pile of shit... Nobody said he raped the baby, fuckface. He had video of the rape of the baby, dumbshit, and the statute calls it a 'performance'. Stupid mother fuckers like you have no ability to understand that child porn is a DEMAND DRIVEN MARKET and if it was not for perverted shitbags like Schwartz ( and maybe yourself ) there would far less 6 month old children getting fucked by you faggots..
I'm not defending anyone. The title is misleading.
Having an image of an act is simply not the same as doing the act. Your logic is flawed.
Think about it logically and not emotionally for a second. If a person has images of adult murder, for example, do we charge them with murder? Of course not.
If they pay money to have a snuff (murder) film made, then we charge them with solicitation of murder. If they simply have a picture of it we would just think that person is sick in the head, but they would not be charged with a crime.
CP of course is so horrible that it's illegal, and I fully agree with this, but the title of this post is misleading. Hysterical mob justice is not what we need to solve this pedogate problem.
view the rest of the comments →
meowski ago
He did not rape a baby. He had child porn images. In light of that, this bail amount is appropriate. A lot of people have images of criminal acts and we don't act like they actually committed the act themselves unless there is evidence.
You're just getting swept up in this mob mentality witch hunt that is pizzagate. Yes, child porn and exploitation is bad. Totally horrible and wrong. But having pictures of something horrible is not the same as committing the act, and the punishment should fit the crime.
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
It is the same. It's sexual gratification taken from the abusive torture of a child. Or in this case, a 6 month old baby.
It''s ruining the life of another human being, a defenseless baby, for the purpose of an adult's sexual arousal.
How you're unable to comprehend that is astounding.
I hope someone video tapes your torture. I hope it's sold for the pleasure of other's viewing and you're victimizatiin is forever recorded. I hope people get off to it to such an extent, you're hunted like a fucking animal and abused again. I hope whoever does actually commit the assault is paid a shit ton of money off of your suffering, over and over and over.
meowski ago
There are various levels of involvement in a crime. Of course he sounds like a sick pervert viewing and having images of CP. If he directly paid money for it I consider that far worse. And actually physically raping a child (as the title here misleadingly implies) would of obviously deserve the worst punishment.
How do you know he even paid any money for it? You sound like a hysterical moron. It's a good thing retards like you are not in charge of actual criminal investigations. Instead you just sit around and talk tough on the internet.
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
If you had any idea how ironic your comments are...
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
I didn't say he paid for it, you sadistic fuck. I said I hope whoever creates and disseminates your torture video gets paid a dick load of money.
Learn to read, pedo.
remedy4reality ago
How do you know he's not the guy fucking the baby, you dumb fuck ? Look at the judge on the case, you fucking faggot.
Now you're doubling down on your stupidity ?? fuck off, already.
remedy4reality ago
you're a pile of shit... Nobody said he raped the baby, fuckface. He had video of the rape of the baby, dumbshit, and the statute calls it a 'performance'. Stupid mother fuckers like you have no ability to understand that child porn is a DEMAND DRIVEN MARKET and if it was not for perverted shitbags like Schwartz ( and maybe yourself ) there would far less 6 month old children getting fucked by you faggots..
NOW... FUCK OFF AND DIE
meowski ago
blocked you f*ng rabid moron
remedy4reality ago
you got downvoated into oblivion for that dumb fuck comment, you faggot..
You are marked around here, pedo apologist piece of filth.
DerivaUK ago
In the case of child porn I believe every viewer the same as the participants. Same gratification involved. How can you defend this pos?
meowski ago
I'm not defending anyone. The title is misleading.
Having an image of an act is simply not the same as doing the act. Your logic is flawed.
Think about it logically and not emotionally for a second. If a person has images of adult murder, for example, do we charge them with murder? Of course not. If they pay money to have a snuff (murder) film made, then we charge them with solicitation of murder. If they simply have a picture of it we would just think that person is sick in the head, but they would not be charged with a crime.
CP of course is so horrible that it's illegal, and I fully agree with this, but the title of this post is misleading. Hysterical mob justice is not what we need to solve this pedogate problem.
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
No, you're right. Possession of material showing adults sexually torturing a 6 months old is no big deal. /s
remedy4reality ago
I would lop Schwartz's head right the fuck off.
You would give him a pillow and ask if he was comfortable..
You're a pseudo intellectual pile of shit and are here for a specific reason.