I think it is true.. or do you think it is a coincidence that both democrat pedos (((Jacob Schwartz))) and (((Anthony Weiner))) got caught under Trump and not under Obumma?
and there lies the problem... this immunity and non-disclosure is sickening. They want the public to fight for the politicians and go to war for them at the drop of a word, but apparently aren't fit enough to get the real truth from full disclosure of all issues.
That's the problem, the public aren't allowed any type of honest full disclosure, not only in the Weiner case, but all cases. They might declassify documents but even then censoring and deleting is a massive problem. This is wrong.
This promotes the problems we're seeing right now. The public want the truth and they aren't getting it. That's why this forum is in place, or didn't you put that together yet. Legal basis for disclosure? How about full transparency from officials with the purpose of preventing crime that is prevalent globally.
*note: the officials work for the public, the public don't work for the officials. It's all ass backwards to protect a criminal playground and that's exactly what's happening. .
You've been lied to about the Weiner laptop. The story was the NYPD got the laptop first and were on the verge of making arrests, then the FBI bigfooted them and demanded the case. The NYPD was worried the FBI wouldn't got after all these supposedly dozens of gutwrenching crimes, so they copied the evidence and if Comey didn't come through, they were going to leak all the evidence.
Well it didn't happen. The NYPD didn't leak all these supposed evidence of horrible crimes. It didn't happen because the story was a fake. The NYPD were not the ones who seized the laptop, the FBI was. The FBI HAS had possession of it all the way through.
view the rest of the comments →
quantokitty ago
I only wish this was true. It certainly doesn't appear it is, but then our lousy fake news wouldn't be reporting this, would they?
GrDec ago
I think it is true.. or do you think it is a coincidence that both democrat pedos (((Jacob Schwartz))) and (((Anthony Weiner))) got caught under Trump and not under Obumma?
quantokitty ago
Weiner was caught last year ... before the election.
GrDec ago
Yes, but he was convicted under Trump.
The Trump admin worked out his plea deal and his jail term.
He would have never served jail under Obumma.
quantokitty ago
True .... I'd love to know what else is on that computer ...
shoosh ago
and there lies the problem... this immunity and non-disclosure is sickening. They want the public to fight for the politicians and go to war for them at the drop of a word, but apparently aren't fit enough to get the real truth from full disclosure of all issues.
RweSure ago
what non-disclosure? what you are you talking about? What is the legal basis for the disclosure you are thinking of?
If you think the Weiner laptop was jammed with evidence of other crimes, you've been lied to.
shoosh ago
Lied to? No evidence of other crimes? Prove it.
That's the problem, the public aren't allowed any type of honest full disclosure, not only in the Weiner case, but all cases. They might declassify documents but even then censoring and deleting is a massive problem. This is wrong.
This promotes the problems we're seeing right now. The public want the truth and they aren't getting it. That's why this forum is in place, or didn't you put that together yet. Legal basis for disclosure? How about full transparency from officials with the purpose of preventing crime that is prevalent globally. *note: the officials work for the public, the public don't work for the officials. It's all ass backwards to protect a criminal playground and that's exactly what's happening. .
RweSure ago
You've been lied to about the Weiner laptop. The story was the NYPD got the laptop first and were on the verge of making arrests, then the FBI bigfooted them and demanded the case. The NYPD was worried the FBI wouldn't got after all these supposedly dozens of gutwrenching crimes, so they copied the evidence and if Comey didn't come through, they were going to leak all the evidence.
Well it didn't happen. The NYPD didn't leak all these supposed evidence of horrible crimes. It didn't happen because the story was a fake. The NYPD were not the ones who seized the laptop, the FBI was. The FBI HAS had possession of it all the way through.
shoosh ago
Another related question....
You say that FBI was in charge of the investigation, not NYPD. That wouldn't be in keeping with regular protocol.
An example of regular protocol click on link and scroll half way down:
http://politopinion.com/2017/05/manhattan-young-democrats-arrested-child-porn-charges/
For example, in the above link Schwartz was investigate first by NYPD special computer team, which is the norm.