https://streamable.com/4ixlf
subtle rat lines, subtle compromise of children, and subtle organ harvesting, "Washington is screaming for that so, that's why I'm here, trying to get back to the good ole days".
(If the sound isn't working, here it is cued up: https://youtu.be/d3NfiX08NzI?t=22m36s))
In short, he has admitted that he's "here" (in the US? from where, Israel? where did he go to high school?) to restore the rat lines to the "good ole days", the 'more subtle forms', think Kissinger rather than Alefantis (gotta keep those Rothschilds off the coke!).
Although he had his YouTube account for several years (since 2009, I believe), his channel was silent until he popped up with his avalanche of videos at the exact same time pizzagate emerged. So it would make sense "Washington" (DC) 'called him in' to restore subtlety, not to end things. And at the same time, I would argue, he was meant to distract us and confuse us... at best. It's possible he is doing some sort of mind control operation, given the things I've learned on this sub over the past 5 months... I would be stupid not to entertain the notion that the deep state isn't just going to sit back and let us "investigate", unfettered.
Please share this information far and wide. Once someone has told you who they are, believe them.
They're hiding in plain sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwMLSDdGGX4
And they might be trying to set up the truth community for a false flag of some sort, who knows? https://youtu.be/86ysptXmzfg?t=13s
view the rest of the comments →
FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago
You must have not understood what i said... Or maybe I'm not understanding what you said... But I said, Attack the the information he is providing. What about his information was wrong, what information are people in deniable about? To clarify; Information pertaining to this research... not george webb himself. I'll have to watch his entire clip, as there is usually a lot of context that has been cut out, or it has been misinterpreted by who ever is attacking him... But It's interesting you only have the last sentence in quotes.... but you don't quote the things that you're saying we should stop supporting him and deem his information invalid.
George has an audience that knows him. They know what he means when he says certain things.... I DO NOT know what he means in this specific instance, again, as I have not watched it in its entirety. But again, the attacks are the same attacks with different "Evidence."
For example, when people attack him for saying He likes bill clinton, it doesn't mean he presenting information on behalf of bill clinton.... In fact, he's presented more damning information on the clintons, than voat has as whole... ten times over. Do I think he should be saying shit like that? NO I wish he didn't.... But only because I know It gives people like you something to bitch about.
If given the choice right now, Between current practices, and old practices, are you suggesting it doesn't matter? it's all the same? Because thinking like that is your problem. It's not the same, It's not comparable. But again, I'm not commenting on the current attacks against george, as I have not seen his full video... But even without seeing the full video, It's obvious your attacking him for the same shit everyone's been attacking him for, from the start.
Attacking george because of george.... And ignoring the irrefutable amount of evidence he's put forth. He's basically exposed more than this entire forum has, 10 times over. If you just started watching george, I understand how you're unaware of that... you have 750 videos from the last 230+ days that you'd need to watch to catch up.
So maybe you can shut me up right now... What information has he put forth that is disinfo? Or simply incorrect? For you to answer that, you'll need to state how you know the information is incorrect. I'm not saying you have to accept everything he says as fact, in fact, you'd be retarded to do so. But what data has he put forth that is in correct, and how do you know it's in correct? Working theory is not an example of his data being incorrect. Working theory is speculation based on the verifiable data. So please enlighten me with once piece of data that is incorrect