https://streamable.com/4ixlf
subtle rat lines, subtle compromise of children, and subtle organ harvesting, "Washington is screaming for that so, that's why I'm here, trying to get back to the good ole days".
(If the sound isn't working, here it is cued up: https://youtu.be/d3NfiX08NzI?t=22m36s))
In short, he has admitted that he's "here" (in the US? from where, Israel? where did he go to high school?) to restore the rat lines to the "good ole days", the 'more subtle forms', think Kissinger rather than Alefantis (gotta keep those Rothschilds off the coke!).
Although he had his YouTube account for several years (since 2009, I believe), his channel was silent until he popped up with his avalanche of videos at the exact same time pizzagate emerged. So it would make sense "Washington" (DC) 'called him in' to restore subtlety, not to end things. And at the same time, I would argue, he was meant to distract us and confuse us... at best. It's possible he is doing some sort of mind control operation, given the things I've learned on this sub over the past 5 months... I would be stupid not to entertain the notion that the deep state isn't just going to sit back and let us "investigate", unfettered.
Please share this information far and wide. Once someone has told you who they are, believe them.
They're hiding in plain sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwMLSDdGGX4
And they might be trying to set up the truth community for a false flag of some sort, who knows? https://youtu.be/86ysptXmzfg?t=13s
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
Why are there so many people complaining about me sharing this information? This is earth-shattering. A guy was sent in to disrupt our pizzagate investigation, he has admitted to working for Mossad, and now he is telling us he was called in to restore more subtle forms of, essentially, pizzagate.
If you don't see it that way, fine. But i'm sick pf being trolled by Webb's online army, the same ones who demand that every big channel interview Webb - this is all the work of Brocks trolls, in my opinion. Very familiar to me, as someone was trolled relentlessly for not supporting Hillary.
So, Brock bots, I am ignoring you. And Jason, I know you read my comments, I am no longer posting my research where you can see it.
ArtificalDuality ago
Yes... another circumstantial logical bit is this:
The videos produced often take a moderate studio and people to be produced. They require editing into a final, convincing result. You have to look through the eyes of a media producer.
Using this, you can tell which videos have "media force" behind them and which not. David Brock's Media Matters Read it. You'll be stunned. This is the NWO media battle plan to shape your truths.
Videos that suggest a media team behind them act as an amplification to content validation. If there's fallacies in the content (truth) conveyed, big chance it's organized effort.
Honey Bee for example is real. She doesn't emphasize the (media) format. She's all content. She also intermingles with the people. GW does not do that. All these 'super-agent-master-investigators' don't do that. Their communications are a one-way street.
Another "bio-marker" of disinfo and noisification is the fact that the videos involved are often hours in length and don't really say much. They are designed to be a time-sink (stealing your valuable time) that keep you trapped in their mills. Quick calculation:
10K people watching a 3-hour video equals 30.000 hours of wasted time. Imagine how 30.000 hours of manpower could be used to USEFUL stuff....
islandofdelight ago
You are ridiculous saying his videos have a 'media force' behind them. They are not hours in length. What even are you talking about? What fallacies?
GrDec ago
You are a liar.
Of course GWS's videos are hours in length.. some of this videos may be short, but he posts hundreds of them. The guy rambles on and on and on, about all kinds of nonsense, and about the same things on and on.. . most of the garbage he says could be condensed in one or two pages of graphs and text.
George Webb Sweigert is pure disinfo.