okay, lets list these out.

1. When you're researching, you come with something called a hypothesis, and then try to support your hypothesis with facts. During the search for supporting facts for your hypothesis, you often stumble across new information, which changes your original hypothesis, and refines the search. When you're doing in this not just by yourself, but in a crowd source format, you have to communicate that process between the presenter and the researchers. That's why you say he 'constantly contradicts himself'. Have you EVER written a research paper? Have you EVER done a major group project or report in school? People would say you contradicted yourself a LOT in that process. Thats basically what you're doing here. You're assuming this is some pre-produced fox news broadcast, or you are judging it by standards and conventions that make absolutely no sense for the format.

2. He explained himself clearly about why he doesn't want to go for imprisoning all these people, that he'd be happy with just getting them to stop the traffficking and ratlines and hurting innocents. Because when you corner someone and leave them with no way out, they will burn the house down around themselves, meaning killing sprees of loose ends, mass false flags, who knows. You may not agree with him, but it's a valid point. EITHER WAY, whether or not they get prosecuted ISN'T WITHIN HIS POWER OR JURISDICTION, it's not his choice, and he doesn't get to say "oh mr. prosecutor, you can't use the evidence i uncovered and shared publicly in your case against the clintons." And his investigation has already produced alot more solid connections, meta-data, and hard evidence on this crime ring than this pizza forum has yet to pull up on Alefantis.

3. Show me the messages from Wendy where George Webb threatened her. If it's who i'm thinking of, it was someone crazy lady that posted a bunch of crazy over-exaggerations based on her paranoid interpretations of what George said. There was never any actual threat, just a tweet or two of flirting, not even that, just grand-standing by George.

4. George Webb Sweigert has clearly stated several times why he is doing this. If you don't know his stated reason for doing this, that just shows your lack of effort in actually researching his background for yourself.

5. When you're an engineer, you make good money. If you're not a dumbass with that money, you usually invest it in a house as well as several other assets, if not multiple houses as rentals. George Webb has a an engineering and programming background, and ended up being an engineering software salesman, like alot of my adjunct engineering profs had as well. Believe it or not, people who aren't dumbasses can actually make enough money to retire early.

6. George is something called a 'human being'. You see, human beings are not perfect creatures. We have weaknesses, individual interpreations of morality and different ideas about what we value. George obviously likes his drink. I bet your not exactly an Adonis yourself. This is engaging in AD HOMINEM and trying to distract by attacking the messsenger not the message. A classic tactic of a dis-information operative, or stumbling block of a lazy pseudo-intellectual.

7. Maybe the thing thats keeping George ALIVE is exactly what you're complaining about. Staying in the public eye, not missing A SINGLE DAY OF PROOF OF LIFES AND META DATA TRAILS, makes it hard for someone to stealthily take him out. You do understand that right? That it's easier to get away with killing someone no one knows much about, or have constant updates on their whereabouts, what they're doing? Do you know how murders are investigated? How they put together motive, opportunity, etc? Constantly being on the move and constantly vlogging is probably the only thing keeping him safe from the people he's exposing.

8. Have you ever considered that, just like George Webb, those 'other Youtubers' you follow might be taking down their OWN videos? So that they can say "OMG IM BEING CENSORED, SO WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT MUST BE IMPORTANT, PLEASE WATCH MORE!". If you can apply that skepticism to GW but not to others, it shows your implicit bias. You probably like, understand, relate to, or some other irrational emotional bias toward the ones you don't apply that skepticism to. That's called tribalism, and it's a big stumbling block for pseudo-intellectuals.

9. So Defango says he has THE rabbit, not just someone saying they're THE rabbit, on his channel. Again, how do you KNOW its THE rabbit, not just another liar, fraud, friend of defango, etc. Maybe Defango really believes he's the rabbit. Is Defango an omniscient god? Is he incapable of fault? Sounds like double standards from where I'm standing, which is a sure give away that you haven't thought critically about this, or are just willingly spreading propaganda for what you believe is the 'truth'. Which makes you no better than what you're accusing others of.

10. Show me some hard evidence that anyone that has come forward to George Webb with information has suffered reprisals from George Webb or someone connected to George Webb. If you believe all this nonsense and conjecture and assumptions you're spewing, without hard evidence that you can confidently and freely share, than you're just blowing smoke out your ass, and your accusations of George just start to sound a lot like you're projecting what you think of your self.