You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Fatsack ago

For that to be true you have to have evidence that people who have leaked to George Webb have had reprisals against them. Do you have any proof of that?

Poot_McGarvey ago

No that is not how truth works.

This is a theory worth discussing. Webb has been extremely dramatic, cryptic, and muddy with his revelations. This is circumstantial evidence of some sort of psyop. And these videos go in to this theory in all the depth currently possible on the facts that we have. Furthermore, if Imyourghost is right and Webb has been caught in a lie, that is further circumstantial evidence.

Just because we don't have enough evidence yet.... doesn't mean that its not true.

Fatsack ago

He hass not been cryptic at all, he cites fucking everything, you probably havent even opened up his presenation have you? Just because you're a lazy dumbass who can't pay attention or be bothered to watch the back log of videos or look up his citations yourself, doesn't mean he's being 'cryptic'. It means you're dumb, really really dumb, and lazy.

Poot_McGarvey ago

haha dude I've watched probably 100 of his videos. He spits a lot of truth... but there are things that are concerning to me.

By cryptic I mean that he is all over the place. He says one thing and then he's on to another. He gives little pieces of things and then comes back to little things in later videos. Some of the things he's saying are very much NOT cited... and are given as truth with no supporting evidence or context.

I'm not saying I believe 100% he's controlled op but I think its definitely worth discussion.

Fatsack ago

Put yourself in his shoes. You might be willing to deceive or bluff that you know something you're not 100% on because you know the people you're investigating are also watching, or at least aware of it. I do that shit in video games, board games, at the office, it's called STRATEGY. Just look at how far he has actually pushed the story of the Awans, the tangible evidence that he broke with a 'working theory' that was later produced or verified or brought into the light elsewhere. You should never believe anyone 100%, you should never let the MESSENGER affect your interpretation of the MESSAGE. You should judge an argument on its OWN merits and the supporting evidence and facts offered to support it. AS WELL as actually checking up on claims yourself. "BELIEVING PEOPLE", ANYONE, is what lazy idiots do. Take what they say as a starting point not an ending point, and find out for yourself.

Poot_McGarvey ago

I have brah.

But you should look in to what people like defango have been dropping. George has been at minimum a bit sloppy with the truth, and his boy Jason Goodman has been doing some very shady shit to people who were just asking regular questions.

Fatsack ago

Im not aware of any evidence or actual breakthroughs made by Defango. Can you name one that has pushed the investigation forward or gained more attention for the issue?