You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gumshoe_mob ago

I have posted a longer version of my take on George Webb here : (edit, see below)

When his videos were too erratic to follow, I searched for interviews he has given. Those interviews are the most interesting of his quest. He knows quite a lot about the workings of the government. He is spot on - on his history. If one ignored all the unprovable statements he has made, there is quite a lot left to learn from him. I don't think his channel was for anything more than giving him a platform to get information out to people about what our government is doing. I wouldn't discard the baby with the bath water, I should say.

Edit: I couldn't figure out how to link to my comment on another page so here it is.

GW's videos are too erratic to really follow. Where's the beginning? So, I watched interviews that he gave. He seems to be quite well versed in every "conspiracy" there is. During his interview with Kerry Cassidy at Project Camelot (which I became familiar with because of the interview with Benjamin Fulford -- note, good interview) many suspected government projects were discussed. If you are familiar with Dutchsinse and his videos on weather modification as well as simulated earthquakes, you will see just how knowledgeable George really is. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAiMyaknxv0YouTube

And so, I've been trying to find the end game -- or the meaning of his wild goose chase of phantoms. I wondered if the point wasn't so much to solve the Hardy Boys' mysteries -- but to use the pizzagate and Hillarygate platform to inform the public about OTHER stuff he knows. You know, stuff that goes on, and the names of the operations they do, and the capability of government technology, and the dangers of Dyncorp. Some of that stuff is outrageous and is quite true. He is not a dummy.

Like the game of chess, there are corresponding players on each team, each using that piece's strengths. At one point I wondered -- with all these capabilities of our government if he isn't telling us that we... are... in... checkmate. All the conspiracies are true. Those who hold power, hold it exclusively to ensure they will win. And they are saying "hello" from the control panel. Pretty sick, eh?? Maybe, just maybe, he is Anonymous.

Edit: While watching the interview with Project Camelot -- knowing that "Camelot" was often referred to during John Kennedy's presidency -- a much loved president with a lovely wife -- and hearing the two of them discuss a "brotherhood" that the Dulles brothers formed within the CIA -- I hoped that the Kennedy's set up a "brotherhood" of their own to fight what they saw coming. In order to fight it, we must understand it, and George Webb is teaching us. hmm???

Coco-Hamilton ago

Not sure about how spot on his history is. This man has invoked the Pinkertons in several videos even going so far as saying that Rockefeller created and gave the Pinkertons their name because he wanted them to have a dainty British name. Never mind that Rockefeller was still so young and wasnt even in any business yet when Allan Pinkerton began the agency. I guess in his mind Allan Pinkerton didnt exist. Pinkerton was a Scott btw...schmuck. i admit...a small nit-picky detail to pounce on, but it is an example of how really uninformed he is and how he perverts reality to make his point. Another moment, speaking on history, would be him talking about his precious metadata and the case of Jack the Ripper. He wanted to put emphasis on metadata by saying the only evidence they had in that case was metadata..there were no witnesses. So glory be metadata. That was not even remotely true, there was actually multiple witnesses in that case who gave descriptions. Point is...he will deceive, misrepresent and lie outright to smash a square peg into a round hole...at least one that fits his agenda.