George Webb has figure out who killed Seth Rich. Let's step back a moment. Sometimes dot connecting gets ahead of itself.
I've watched the entire series, and a lot of it feels like the disinfo technique of mixing about 20% constructed narrative into about 80% truth. I stuck around for the truth (which I think is the ratlines, blackberry, 'school play' and assorted spycraft,) but there were always red flags, like:
-
the way he kept referring to the Seth Rich medical info as a "report" without disclosing that it was an anonymous 4Chan post. So much for transparency.
-
the slippage and blurring when he spoke about Muslim organizations, eg claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood and Hezbollah were trading intel, without explaining why in the world that would be, since they are antagonists without common ideology. But I also knew he had connections to Israel, which would explain the less rational info about Hezbollah. Then he started talking about Saudis, while pointing to a photo that was clearly an Afghan tribesman. I know all Muslims are interchangeable to many US viewers, but it was as ridiculous as talking about Chinese people and pointing to an Indian as evidence. I couldn't tell if he was that ignorant, or if he was exploiting the assumed ignorance of the audience to sell his narrative.
-
His obsession with McCabe. McCabe was hacking his computer, deleting stuff that GW now admits he deleted himself, McCabe issued immunity deals, the way he flubbed when asked why he was sure McCabe did so, but Comey wasn't involved, etc. Not defending McCabe, but it felt fishy.
-
Doxxing that Marine in the rented house, including even mentioning where he had originally come from (which is the type of info that's useful if you want to track down someone's family.)
-
The revelation of the killer, with such flimsy evidence.
-
The biggest WTF?? was when he'd had a bit of wine and started saying how he wanted to return the IC to the old days, where instead of these out of control ratlines, there was just a little organ harvesting, just a little trafficking, just a little compromising people with children. What?? I expected him to post something the next morning taking it back and explaining what he really meant, but no.
-
Today he's been waxing nostalgic about the early IC again, and basically admitted he's affiliated with Mossad, qualifying that there are 2 Mossads, the new one involved in the milieu around Clinton, and the old one, the great Mossad that made Israel what it is today.
That's it. I'm out. Still watching, but don't trust him at all. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6e825u/george_webb_has_figure_out_who_killed_seth_rich/
And this from reddit: Wtf?! Is George Webb working for Mossad, Israeli intelligence. Check this out, very strange
I've been following George webb for a while and I enjoy his work on the Seth Rich investigation. But, being a conspiracy junkie, I keep an open mind and look at all theories until there proven otherwise.
Anyways, after doing a quick search on George Webb theres this thread on Voat on him. If you look in the comments section there's another link to another thread, showing proof of his brother being an ex NSA agent.
So, this morning George named the killer, awan brothers, and he started freaking out saying he think they will call a Hitman on him. He calls jason goodman while he's still in hotel and jason uploads this call to his YouTube. Wtf is George talking about?? It seems like he works for someone and "they picked jason to film" REALLY STRANGE if you ask me
So he was locked in his hotel and scared to leave until his friend, comedian guy, came and got him. So, george starts periscope LIVE (webb4bernie) just in case anything happens to him. So, then he tells us, the viewers, we are all Mossad agents bc we helped research. WTF (I went back in the scopes and couldn't find the video he says this at, so if u watch his scopes please post the video he says it. Thx(
Periscope 1 - George scaring Jason in this scope. Brainstorming all different ways the hitmen can take them both out.
Periscope 2 18:50 - when referring to Israel he says "We" like he's one of them and Jason is confused and asked if he once lived there.
Periscope 3 17 mins - he says usually when someone has a high IQ there's usually intelligence behind them supporting them. Is he referring to himself?
Interview - Jason and George finally arrive to Dr. Coris house for an interview. Dr. Corsi works with infowars and there's a lot of spectaclation Alex works for the Israeli intelligence
Also, go to his periscope and the last 12 videos are all from today. Watch them bc they are pretty intense and really strange. If you see where he calls all his viewers "mossad agents" please screen shot the comments, bc a lot of us were shocked he said that we were Mossad agents.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6ea5jp/wtf_is_george_webb_working_for_mossad_israeli/
view the rest of the comments →
gumshoe_mob ago
I have posted a longer version of my take on George Webb here : (edit, see below)
When his videos were too erratic to follow, I searched for interviews he has given. Those interviews are the most interesting of his quest. He knows quite a lot about the workings of the government. He is spot on - on his history. If one ignored all the unprovable statements he has made, there is quite a lot left to learn from him. I don't think his channel was for anything more than giving him a platform to get information out to people about what our government is doing. I wouldn't discard the baby with the bath water, I should say.
Edit: I couldn't figure out how to link to my comment on another page so here it is.
GW's videos are too erratic to really follow. Where's the beginning? So, I watched interviews that he gave. He seems to be quite well versed in every "conspiracy" there is. During his interview with Kerry Cassidy at Project Camelot (which I became familiar with because of the interview with Benjamin Fulford -- note, good interview) many suspected government projects were discussed. If you are familiar with Dutchsinse and his videos on weather modification as well as simulated earthquakes, you will see just how knowledgeable George really is. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAiMyaknxv0YouTube
And so, I've been trying to find the end game -- or the meaning of his wild goose chase of phantoms. I wondered if the point wasn't so much to solve the Hardy Boys' mysteries -- but to use the pizzagate and Hillarygate platform to inform the public about OTHER stuff he knows. You know, stuff that goes on, and the names of the operations they do, and the capability of government technology, and the dangers of Dyncorp. Some of that stuff is outrageous and is quite true. He is not a dummy.
Like the game of chess, there are corresponding players on each team, each using that piece's strengths. At one point I wondered -- with all these capabilities of our government if he isn't telling us that we... are... in... checkmate. All the conspiracies are true. Those who hold power, hold it exclusively to ensure they will win. And they are saying "hello" from the control panel. Pretty sick, eh?? Maybe, just maybe, he is Anonymous.
Edit: While watching the interview with Project Camelot -- knowing that "Camelot" was often referred to during John Kennedy's presidency -- a much loved president with a lovely wife -- and hearing the two of them discuss a "brotherhood" that the Dulles brothers formed within the CIA -- I hoped that the Kennedy's set up a "brotherhood" of their own to fight what they saw coming. In order to fight it, we must understand it, and George Webb is teaching us. hmm???
Coco-Hamilton ago
Not sure about how spot on his history is. This man has invoked the Pinkertons in several videos even going so far as saying that Rockefeller created and gave the Pinkertons their name because he wanted them to have a dainty British name. Never mind that Rockefeller was still so young and wasnt even in any business yet when Allan Pinkerton began the agency. I guess in his mind Allan Pinkerton didnt exist. Pinkerton was a Scott btw...schmuck. i admit...a small nit-picky detail to pounce on, but it is an example of how really uninformed he is and how he perverts reality to make his point. Another moment, speaking on history, would be him talking about his precious metadata and the case of Jack the Ripper. He wanted to put emphasis on metadata by saying the only evidence they had in that case was metadata..there were no witnesses. So glory be metadata. That was not even remotely true, there was actually multiple witnesses in that case who gave descriptions. Point is...he will deceive, misrepresent and lie outright to smash a square peg into a round hole...at least one that fits his agenda.