Why does Jones still identify Podesta guilty as charged? If you actually listened to Jones you'd know he's said this at least six times since the Alefantis retraction. Alefantis and co. identified Jones as the ideal party to apply maximum pressure for a retraction as a proxy for all other pg commentators. You don't have a flying clue what took place behind the scenes with this veritable Rothschild and what kind of communication took place between JA and/or his lawyers and Jones. Even you acknowledge Alefantis is almost certainly from the world's most ruthless clan. Jones did precisely what he had to in order to have Infowars remain viable. Why can't you see that? Jones is a father, and a good one. Given the opportunity, he'd gouge the eyeballs out of any pedophile. Twenty-two years of an impeccable record savaging the elite for being satanic child sex torturers, someone who a platform to people like Ted Gunderson and Nancy Schaeffer over and over again, and you want to destroy him for one thoroughly unavoidable tactical decision.

Here's something you do not know which might come as a surprise. I too wish Jones would have stayed the course on Alefantis. He had been on top of CPP for two solid weeks before having to take the action he did. However, I do not hold it against him because I recognize the value of Infowars on every other battle front. There are other people who have the Alefantis angle covered. Jones exercised self preservation, and he did the right thing in order to fight another day. You're going to learn the truth some day V____Z, one way or another.