Yeah, I know Alex Jones isn't the most popular guy on this site at the moment, but he actually seemed genuinely freaked out about this. His discussion begins around the 5:00 mark in this video
Corsi in my estimation is a pretty straight shooter - nowhere near the bombastic style of Alex, so it's sounding pretty serious to hear he said anything like this. This is getting beyond freakin' weird.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I would question claims coming from anyone associated with InfoWars.
betoche ago
Dr. Jerome Corsi is perhaps #1 out there, for knowledge on the Clinton Machine and many other things. Remember FBI Anon said this, regarding HRC: """"The only person coming close is Jerome Corsi. He is putting the pieces together (loosely)."""
V____Z ago
But if he's partnered up with a limited hangout like Alex "Alefantis is innocent" Jones, then his past accolades are irrelevant.
Pizzalawyer ago
Alex Jones said some pretty stupid things about Alefantis and Gang and was facing the threat of a lawsuit; he had to make amends publicly. Let's forgive his lack of judgment on that matter and be grateful for his other contributions and for his many well informed and articulate guests.
V____Z ago
I should have added this. Alex is making up a story about how the pizzagate emails originated - this is disinfo https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1618655
V____Z ago
He showed no proof that he was facing a lawsuit, and it wouldn't make sense that he was, given other large channels have been far more outspoken (he was an Alefantis apologist from early on) and have received no such threat. It's not easy to imagine Alefantis willingly showing up in court. I don't believe Alex; he hadsbeen caught giving disinfo. I think he is a CIA limited hangout, and he does have close ties to the CIA through his family; the head of Infowars last worked for Stratfor. I think when we are in danger of being infiltrated and led astray, pointing out potential pitfalls becomes important. Disinfo agents are dangerous, and our crowd is innocent and desperately hungry for justice, we are ripe for infiltration. Tis investigation has been fruitful enough to warrant being targeted by the deep state.
Limited hangouts are recognized by the fact that they do give out some food to attract and keep their audience. Even if only 10% is poisoned with lies, twists, distraction, it is deadly for a fledgling research group such as ours.
rwb2 ago
If Jones showed proof, you'd say he manufactured it, because that's your style. You are the quintessential example of a disinformation agent, or a breathtaking hypocrite, and the casual reader can make the determination which it really is. I've savaged you on a point by point basis with regard to Jones how many times now, like my post above that you conveniently did not respond to, and yet you still come back for more.
If there was one person on the planet that was the perfect target to threaten to sue as proxy for other pg researchers, purportedly including you (and I'm using the word purportedly very loosely) it would be Alex Jones. The fact you cannot remotely identify any of the multitude of reasons why Jones was the perfect target to extract a retraction from shows you are either a fantastically weak tactician, or disinformation. Anyone attempting to destroy one of the godfathers of the truth movement, someone who savages Clinton, Podesta, and the PTB/NWO day in and day out is in fact the real source of disinformation and discord.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Bingo! Look at the BS Roger Stone is always spewing! Jones himself is a shill
rwb2 ago
Sure, that's why you have whole submissions about the interesting reporting of Hagmann and Hagmann and Jon Rappoport. Did you question the veracity of these people when I informed you previously that they were all close associates of Jones, having not only been guests on Infowars but in fact have even guest hosted the show in addition to being contributors of articles to Infowars? If so, is the fact that you did not know Hagmann, Hagmann, and Rappoport were so close to Jones and for many years prior to your citing their reporting in your submissions not clear evidence that you are a thoroughly shoddy researcher and therefore cannot be trusted on any matter? Or if I have it wrong, perhaps you can merely enlighten the general reader why you made the statement you just made when you've often used close associates of Infowars when it suits you. And finally, are you now saying you would not present a submission in the future with content from Jon Rappoport like you did previously?
You're a hypocrite of inordinate magnitude V____Z. Be a man and admit that either you know nothing about Jones because you did not even know that H&H & R were associates of Jones before you made your submissions with content from same, or admit that there are lots of good and interesting journalists associated with Infowars, or admit that you take advantage of any convenient opportunity to denigrate Jones out of sheer habit. By the way, I also recall you citing Ted Gunderson, yet another frequent Jones guest. Why was Gunderson trustworthy when you mention him, but untrustworthy otherwise because of his association with Infowars?
SuperShilly ago
Loved reading this. People who hate Jones are the ones that pop into a thread shitting on him using MSMs coverage of "Him".
I'll put it this way, he's the first leg of a race. He's only responsible for getting you 1/4 of the way there. If you are too fucking stupid to disseminate the info he is giving out then shut the fuck up and let those with enough intelligence to wade though bullshit.