I would not be so quick to condemn this guy as a pervert. He may be one, but I think that perhaps he was the holder of the child porn material that was going to be planted on computers of some good guys.
I just worded my thought poorly. I am saying, there could be more here than meets the eyes. He could be a democat operative and the reason he has all of that material is because it is part of a Clinton/podesta/brock/ mook scheme for blackmailing. He is a computer programming analyst afterall.
The New York Post's article says there is a picture of Schwartz posing with Mook. I also found some old listings for "Manhattan Young Democrats" events with Mook. Oddly the only event on that page with Schwartz present isn't visible on the page (but can find in page source).
NYP: https://archive.is/xVP62
events: http://archive.is/U7XL8
view the rest of the comments →
Commoner ago
I would not be so quick to condemn this guy as a pervert. He may be one, but I think that perhaps he was the holder of the child porn material that was going to be planted on computers of some good guys.
facevalue ago
... what? Please tell me that was just a failed joke.
Commoner ago
I just worded my thought poorly. I am saying, there could be more here than meets the eyes. He could be a democat operative and the reason he has all of that material is because it is part of a Clinton/podesta/brock/ mook scheme for blackmailing. He is a computer programming analyst afterall.
PepeFarmRemembers ago
The New York Post's article says there is a picture of Schwartz posing with Mook. I also found some old listings for "Manhattan Young Democrats" events with Mook. Oddly the only event on that page with Schwartz present isn't visible on the page (but can find in page source). NYP: https://archive.is/xVP62 events: http://archive.is/U7XL8