https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3FMgZruOXE
Shawn Lucas helped serve the Democratic National Committee with a lawsuit alleging fraud in the presidential race.
Lucas, 38, died on August 2, less than one month after serving papers to Debbie Wasserman Shultz. The circumstances of his death remained foggy for months, then was attributed to a "fentanyl overdose". Riiiight.
RIP Shawn.
view the rest of the comments →
srayzie ago
I think that no matter what, they will somehow blame all of this on Russia or Trump. We could have the smoking gun and these evil people will focus on who leaked all this info that lead us to the truth, instead of focusing on the crimes themselves. They make me sicker every single day, I'm not saying we should stop trying. But, I feel pretty discouraged. I can't believe they are now trying to quiet a Hannity. If they keep taking away the few that tell the truth, imagine what our world will be like.
pizzagater99 ago
Traditional media is dead. When's the last time you bought a newspaper or went on a news website? They're selling so few newspapers, they have to charge people to view their websites (paywall) and have many many ads online compared to a few years ago, just to stay afloat.
The media that continue to thrive will be the media the vox populi consume - the truth. If Sean Hannity does a good job of exposing possibly the scandal of the decade, it will ensure his survival in the media industry, and the survival of other 'real' journalists.
They control the media. But the media isn't anything anymore.
srayzie ago
You didn't hear? He said tonight on his show that media matters is after him. I read somewhere earlier that some companies are pulling their ads and no longer supporting him. So, he said he doesn't know what the furred holds.
pizzagater99 ago
what does your last sentence mean?
srayzie ago
Sorry. Auto correct lol. I wrote from my iPad. I meant that he doesn't know what his future holds for him at Fox News. That's what he said.
pizzagater99 ago
That's kind of revealing in its own way. Even though he didn't provide proof of Dotcom and Seth's emails. He's subtly saying he's being threatened by big media interests. Therefore we can infer the media can't really be trusted to be objective (pretty big coming from someone in his position).
srayzie ago
Yes. Plus Fox retracted an article about Seth Rich apologizing for posting it before they could verify if it was fake or whatever.
pizzagater99 ago
excellent. they've finally gone too far. their attempt at covering up the truth is actually drawing even more attention to the issue. :)
srayzie ago
Everyone flipping out and being paranoid sure does say a lot huh?