He's the source of the leaks behind pizzagate, the Podesta emails, and was murdered by the very people (or at least on behalf of them) at the heart of pizzagate. It's earth shattering news that we may be close to proving that he was the leaker, which will have ramifications that I can't even begin to imagine. This is huge. And it has everything to do with pizzagate.
I had the same gut reaction to that interview that I had to Sandy Hook family interviews..and many other staged interviews that I now see on American television. I watch the media alot and have some knowledge of it.
I just meant that the panda was a 'prop'...and there could be a number of reasons for that. I've seen a couple of other interviews with the parents and they seem 'prepared'. Again there could be a number of reasons. I'm not as invested in the whole Seth Rich story because I research many topics and I see him as part of a larger whole. I'm just saying don't get too blinkered over him.. I understand the reasons for the intense interest and speculation but there are many elements to the story that seem quite 'managed' to my eye.
I see what you mean, but I also see what other users here are doing. What kind of things are they posting, is it relevant to PG or is it just a distraction tactic and you know, even though some of them are polite and respectable users, I can clearly see their agenda (even if they don't think anyone is on to them). And even though I don't always voice my opinion and leave comments, if I lurk for example, I can still analyse and weigh in what is being said or analyse the evidence they are providing in certain cases. I'm not referring to you in any way, but to some other voaters I've been on to for a month or two. There are 6 here in particular, on my radar right now. I cannot give out names. I just know and keep silent about it, for now. Remember my thread about Podesta's child abuse video? My perception had been influenced by a tweet and after I found out that I'd been played and might have myself regrettably influenced other voaters, I came out and offered a public apology. Since then, I've been playing this sort of 'game' to find out more about people here and their agendas, if they are being real or here to spread disinfo. I guess we get better with time. Still not perfect (I still make mistakes), but isn't the way to success filled with obstacles and failures? Take everything with a grain of salt. Everything. Analyse and don't jump to conclusions on a hunch. Give the benefit of the doubt, where it is due. Usually, if it doesn't seem to "fit" the liberal agenda, it most probably is true. Seth Rich doesn't fit with it. I'm personally ready to bet that he was for real. Assange, Guccifer 2.0, Kim DotCom seem to think so. Here's for getting the damn DNC, Clinton, Podesta, Brock, Mook, et al. Cheers :)
Absolutely. The disinfo game is quite sophisticated and it's still possible for more seasoned researchers to be drawn into a story that's been planted or tampered with in some way. I've got my own list of posters that I wonder about. As you say, 'trust no one and think for yourself'. And just to add a thought, there also seems to be a 'conservative' agenda.
Edit: Researchers need to disassociate themselves from having personal alliances with party politics as it can cloud judgement in our manipulated media-based reality.
When I mentioned Liberal, what I meant was "The NWO-Globalist-Soros-led-Progressive-SJW-BLM-Destroy-the-Family-Unit-push-for-the-normalisation-of-anything-that-is-immoral-and-demonize-everything-that-is-moral-including-family-religion-and-personal-identification-such-as-culture-roots-and-sense-of-nationalism-Divide-and-Conquer-movement". I am not referring to democrats or republicans, liberals or conservatives, not in that sense anyway. I am NOT American, I can't identify with any group, however I see what's going on and I can tell you that this tactic I'm referring to is our common enemy. Just my two, very honest, cents.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
He's the source of the leaks behind pizzagate, the Podesta emails, and was murdered by the very people (or at least on behalf of them) at the heart of pizzagate. It's earth shattering news that we may be close to proving that he was the leaker, which will have ramifications that I can't even begin to imagine. This is huge. And it has everything to do with pizzagate.
cantsleepawink ago
and after seeing the panda interview with the family I believe that we're being played.
YingYangMom ago
Show me proof that Seth Rich was into S&M and a victim of MK Ultra and I will be believing we're being played too.
cantsleepawink ago
That's not what I said :)
YingYangMom ago
Isn't that what you're implying? Enlighten me, please.
cantsleepawink ago
I had the same gut reaction to that interview that I had to Sandy Hook family interviews..and many other staged interviews that I now see on American television. I watch the media alot and have some knowledge of it.
I just meant that the panda was a 'prop'...and there could be a number of reasons for that. I've seen a couple of other interviews with the parents and they seem 'prepared'. Again there could be a number of reasons. I'm not as invested in the whole Seth Rich story because I research many topics and I see him as part of a larger whole. I'm just saying don't get too blinkered over him.. I understand the reasons for the intense interest and speculation but there are many elements to the story that seem quite 'managed' to my eye.
YingYangMom ago
I see what you mean, but I also see what other users here are doing. What kind of things are they posting, is it relevant to PG or is it just a distraction tactic and you know, even though some of them are polite and respectable users, I can clearly see their agenda (even if they don't think anyone is on to them). And even though I don't always voice my opinion and leave comments, if I lurk for example, I can still analyse and weigh in what is being said or analyse the evidence they are providing in certain cases. I'm not referring to you in any way, but to some other voaters I've been on to for a month or two. There are 6 here in particular, on my radar right now. I cannot give out names. I just know and keep silent about it, for now. Remember my thread about Podesta's child abuse video? My perception had been influenced by a tweet and after I found out that I'd been played and might have myself regrettably influenced other voaters, I came out and offered a public apology. Since then, I've been playing this sort of 'game' to find out more about people here and their agendas, if they are being real or here to spread disinfo. I guess we get better with time. Still not perfect (I still make mistakes), but isn't the way to success filled with obstacles and failures? Take everything with a grain of salt. Everything. Analyse and don't jump to conclusions on a hunch. Give the benefit of the doubt, where it is due. Usually, if it doesn't seem to "fit" the liberal agenda, it most probably is true. Seth Rich doesn't fit with it. I'm personally ready to bet that he was for real. Assange, Guccifer 2.0, Kim DotCom seem to think so. Here's for getting the damn DNC, Clinton, Podesta, Brock, Mook, et al. Cheers :)
cantsleepawink ago
Absolutely. The disinfo game is quite sophisticated and it's still possible for more seasoned researchers to be drawn into a story that's been planted or tampered with in some way. I've got my own list of posters that I wonder about. As you say, 'trust no one and think for yourself'. And just to add a thought, there also seems to be a 'conservative' agenda.
Edit: Researchers need to disassociate themselves from having personal alliances with party politics as it can cloud judgement in our manipulated media-based reality.
YingYangMom ago
When I mentioned Liberal, what I meant was "The NWO-Globalist-Soros-led-Progressive-SJW-BLM-Destroy-the-Family-Unit-push-for-the-normalisation-of-anything-that-is-immoral-and-demonize-everything-that-is-moral-including-family-religion-and-personal-identification-such-as-culture-roots-and-sense-of-nationalism-Divide-and-Conquer-movement". I am not referring to democrats or republicans, liberals or conservatives, not in that sense anyway. I am NOT American, I can't identify with any group, however I see what's going on and I can tell you that this tactic I'm referring to is our common enemy. Just my two, very honest, cents.
HolyMoly0 ago
I've been saying "Leftist" instead of "Liberal." Like "Islamist" instead of "Muslim." Leftists and Islamists are the ideological radicals.
YingYangMom ago
Right, thank you. Any ideology that is extreme is bad, no matter what ideology it is.
Verite1 ago
And we should add "Rightist" to the list as well, since many of them were radical, not in facts, science deniers, homophobes, etc.
HolyMoly0 ago
Of course. I don't mean they're the only ideological radicals.
YingYangMom ago
.