You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoberSecondThought ago

There are many, many cases of sexual abuse of foster children. It's a total disaster and a disgrace, and there are undoubtedly elite pedophiles trafficking in foster children. I have been working on a backgrounder on that topic, but it's just so fricking huge and awful that it is taking a lot of time. There are literally horror stories and important clues from every state.

However, I think this might be a case of someone easing their conscience rather than a case of pedophiles infiltrating child protective services. First, look at this article about Comey and his wife fighting over him letting Hillary off.

Next, you might want to look at this post I made about Glenn Beck easing his conscience about not telling the truth about the pedocracy back in 2013.

There are a lot of people in the current system who are not pedophiles. They recognize the futility of sacrificing themselves, but they try to do something to balance the crime of not speaking out. (Note that I am not apologizing for Comey or his wife; I would not take the FBI Director's job in the first place.)

Something to think about, anyway.

FE_Rebekah ago

Thank you for the links and information. You've done a lot of good research.

However, I'm confused what you mean by "easing their conscience." Do you mean it's possible that Comey and/or his wife have been involved in trafficking or the coverup in trafficking, and that they have spent time "helping" children through the legal system to make themselves feel better about what they have done?

I can certainly understand the concept of someone easing their conscience, but I find it to be a rather far fetched assumption that they would have good intentions when it comes to these children.

GeorgeT ago

Comey's wife looks creepy as hell! All fits in. If it were any other couple I would let it slip but we know what we are dealing with. Trump mada a veiled threat for a reason. Donald knows exactly what these two are involved in.

SoberSecondThought ago

I am going mainly by what FBI Anon said, that the proportion of active pedos in Congress is about 20-25 percent, but that pretty much everyone else knows about them. The question arises of how those other people signal their position, how they insure themselves against misunderstandings, and, as I put it, how they ease their conscience.

I find it very interesting that Glenn Beck was allowed to donate $1.5 million to Operation Underground Railroad. To anyone with a little knowledge, it's a dead giveaway of what happened back in June 2013. People get killed for investigating human trafficking (e.g. the Monica Peterson case, the Max Spiers case). Why would they let Beck go to Haiti, of all places, at such a sensitive time?

I think it's because there's a kind of tacit treaty, a rule, for how the elites treat this issue. Some of them (say, Senator Richard Blumenthal, or John and Cindy McCain) are involved in anti-trafficking organizations as a cover. They've infiltrated the organizations that are supposed to catch them, a standard sort of technique much like Communist revolutionaries joining the secret police. But I think there have to be other people, junior Congressmen and their wives, or civil servants like Comey, who aren't actually pedos but who also are involved in anti-trafficking and child protection for their own reasons.

Remember, these people aren't one big happy crime family. Hillary and Obama hate each other. McCain ran against Obama and both sides in that fight were savage to one another. They are tied together by mutual blackmail, fear, power-lust, and perversion, not by genuine respect or support. So there have to be all kinds of tacit deals built into this system, much like the way the Five Families divided up New York in the Godfather movies. I think one of the tacit deals is that if you decide to volunteer to help kids, whether it is a cover for your pedo activities or a way of silently signaling that you're not a pedo, either way it is allowed.

Do you see what I'm getting at here? We need to be careful not to project too much onto our enemies. They aren't all-knowing, or all-powerful. They are not a monolithic enemy. Often one faction is working at cross purposes to another. So I want to avoid assuming that I know Comey's motive, or his wife's motive, when it could easily be quite different from what I first imagine.

crystalclear ago

Absolutely see what you are getting at and I agree. You've also explained it very well