No one here says ALL gay people support NAMBLA, I'm sure many don't. But leading figures certainly have and there are these undertones in the LGBT movement for sure.
Recent example is Milo. Ok, he was not stating support for NAMBLA explicitly, I think explicit support has not been fashionable for quite some time, if that is your point I think you might be right, but Milo certainly spoke positively about relationships between young boys and older men.
That did not go down well with his conservative supporter base, however, they could tolerate his gayness because everything else he does on other accounts, but pedophilia that was a bridge too far. He seems to have come back now and I like that, I also hope he has learned to stay way off the pedophilia topic (whatever his own actual views hopefully we will never hear them expressed again).
You have the examples in the video posted, I've also read several others from around the same time-period but I can't remember the names (the website where I read about it was homosexuellt.com but it has been censored as they were Swedish and writing in Swedish).
Edit: You say LGBT like is was an organization, is it not more a set of ideas? Rather spread out. A bunch of people working toward the goal to have more sexual deviancy in the world. Wanting to recruit others to live homosexual lifestyles, as well as increase the acceptance of said deviancy in public, introduce speech laws etc.
I have never looked closer at NAMBLA, but it would surprise me a lot if they did not subscribe to these set of ideas that goes under the banner "LGBT".
"but it would surprise me a lot if they did not subscribe to these set of ideas that goes under the banner "LGBT""
You should look into it more. LGBT are adamant in their condemnation of Pedophilia. I think you may be thinking of the age of consent is 16 in some states and gay or straight an adult can have sex with a 16 year old. But that's not what the Pedophilia NAMBLA is talking about. They're talking about pre-pubescent boys. It's sick as fuck.
My views are mostly shaped by what I know from my native Sweden, here the organizations (RFSL/RFSU) that are at the forefront of pushing LGBT (here it's called HBTQ where the Q was just added a few years ago) they are the going around in schools and encouraging kids to act out their sexuality "whatever that is".
Here what is included is not at all well defined, instead the definitions are ever expanding, every year a bunch of new sexual weirdness is discovered and added to the protection list. Even the very act of trying to put forth some kind of rigid definition of what kind of sexuality they are talking about is seen a unforgivable statement, as their very point is that all these things are floating and should never be limited by anyone else putting petty things like definitions in the way of the free expression of sexuality.
Here is some background on RFSL:
They used to have a subgroup called "The pedophile workgroup".
Axel Axgil called "the modern Scandinavian homo movement's grand old man", was one of the founders of RFSL. He also out of "solidarity" joined the Danish Pedophile Association and they held an international conference in 1986 with pedophiles from all over the world, where the Swedish delegation was represented by the pedophile workgroup.
Here is a more recent example from Sweden (also RFSL):
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
LGBT doesn't support NAMBLA. There are members of LGBT who have supported NAMBLA. There's a big difference.
Homosexuals are as outraged by pedophilia as anyone else.
Your ignorance of that fact kiiiiiiiiiiiiiind of makes me think you're a shill.
00-00 ago
What is the difference?
No one here says ALL gay people support NAMBLA, I'm sure many don't. But leading figures certainly have and there are these undertones in the LGBT movement for sure.
DarkMath ago
"But leading figures certainly have"
Like who? The only example is some old pervert who broke off from L.G.B.T.. If LGBT was so supported of pedophilia why was NAMBLA created?
The only answer is Pedophilia wasn't acceptable within LGBTs so a small group of pedophile pervs broke off.
00-00 ago
Recent example is Milo. Ok, he was not stating support for NAMBLA explicitly, I think explicit support has not been fashionable for quite some time, if that is your point I think you might be right, but Milo certainly spoke positively about relationships between young boys and older men. That did not go down well with his conservative supporter base, however, they could tolerate his gayness because everything else he does on other accounts, but pedophilia that was a bridge too far. He seems to have come back now and I like that, I also hope he has learned to stay way off the pedophilia topic (whatever his own actual views hopefully we will never hear them expressed again).
You have the examples in the video posted, I've also read several others from around the same time-period but I can't remember the names (the website where I read about it was homosexuellt.com but it has been censored as they were Swedish and writing in Swedish).
Edit: You say LGBT like is was an organization, is it not more a set of ideas? Rather spread out. A bunch of people working toward the goal to have more sexual deviancy in the world. Wanting to recruit others to live homosexual lifestyles, as well as increase the acceptance of said deviancy in public, introduce speech laws etc.
I have never looked closer at NAMBLA, but it would surprise me a lot if they did not subscribe to these set of ideas that goes under the banner "LGBT".
DarkMath ago
"but it would surprise me a lot if they did not subscribe to these set of ideas that goes under the banner "LGBT""
You should look into it more. LGBT are adamant in their condemnation of Pedophilia. I think you may be thinking of the age of consent is 16 in some states and gay or straight an adult can have sex with a 16 year old. But that's not what the Pedophilia NAMBLA is talking about. They're talking about pre-pubescent boys. It's sick as fuck.
00-00 ago
My views are mostly shaped by what I know from my native Sweden, here the organizations (RFSL/RFSU) that are at the forefront of pushing LGBT (here it's called HBTQ where the Q was just added a few years ago) they are the going around in schools and encouraging kids to act out their sexuality "whatever that is".
Here what is included is not at all well defined, instead the definitions are ever expanding, every year a bunch of new sexual weirdness is discovered and added to the protection list. Even the very act of trying to put forth some kind of rigid definition of what kind of sexuality they are talking about is seen a unforgivable statement, as their very point is that all these things are floating and should never be limited by anyone else putting petty things like definitions in the way of the free expression of sexuality.
Here is some background on RFSL:
They used to have a subgroup called "The pedophile workgroup".
Axel Axgil called "the modern Scandinavian homo movement's grand old man", was one of the founders of RFSL. He also out of "solidarity" joined the Danish Pedophile Association and they held an international conference in 1986 with pedophiles from all over the world, where the Swedish delegation was represented by the pedophile workgroup.
Here is a more recent example from Sweden (also RFSL):
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.friatider.se%2Fkand-pedofilledare-invigde-pride&edit-text= http://www.friatider.se/kand-pedofilledare-invigde-pride
But these things really goes back to Alfred Kinsey himself and his talk about "the sexuality of children".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVC-1d5ib50