It's quite obvious and the Portuguese police knew, until the highest U.K. Government agents took over the case "for some reason". Never mind the cadaver dog and blood dog, right? I mean, only the FBI uses them, they can't possibly be right.
They were protected by the uk government because they're part of a pedo ring, they killed her.
Except we know what DIDN'T happen and that's that someone abducted her. We know it didn't happen because the McCanns and their friends have repeatedly lied about basic facts and have refused to do a reconstruction, and because the two cadaver dogs that found corpse odor in the apartment and the hired car have a 100% record.
If you don't trust the dogs, then you're throwing out my whole argument. My statement was "the McCanns and their friends have repeatedly lied about basic facts and have refused to do a reconstruction, AND because the two cadaver dogs that found corpse odor in the apartment and the hired car have a 100% record."
It's all the things taken together that have the full force, not the one thing by itself. And I have lots of other evidence I haven't even mentioned yet.
Exactly. I lack faith in all these creeps, including the police and their dogs.
And the Tabloids - though sometimes they come up with truth when other outlets do not;
(mostly because they can get away with it as many lack confidence in their reporting.
so it doesn't matter if they tell the truth sometimes)
If there is more data I defer to you, who has spent much more time than I.
There's 2 parts to your argument here. A and B
A, they were all lying
This doesn't convince me she was killed
B. The dogs.
The dogs could also be another lie.
Does your whole argument hinge on the dog evidence?
Is there more as you say?
I'm open minded.
Taking a cursory look at "Best Evidence" there; and it's less than convincing.
"would have
prompted an outpouring of grief and concern for their child. It would have
10
prompted reactions such as: Who hired the car before us?, or - Is anyone else
known to have died in our apartment or in the hire car? "
The less than shocked reaction could easily be because they know she is alive.
As I see it, someone has a lot of interest in making people believe she is dead.. That .pdf you sent seems to have that object. The points are well - taken, in and of themselves, and I am open - minded. But why such a strong conviction when there should be open - mindness, especially after the Clinton emails surfaced?
The parents are obviously Crisis Actors.. It's a fable made on TV / Tabloids and Fake News , as are so many others.
Parents will always believe a child is alive if a dead body is missing.. that's known by detectives.
The fact they have failed to announce they believe she is dead, speaks more to their authenticity as parents than otherwise.
I find the "dog" story less than plausible. It's smells like human - interest Propaganda.. "The Hero Dog" 100% .
I may check again the "best evidence" as summarized in that .pdf. but so far it's weak.
" To those of us trained to look at form as well as content, the counter-stories also read like a script, or like a transparent effort at mind control"
view the rest of the comments →
Torkimadi ago
Ffs they killed her and hid the body. Are there still people who think she's missing and the parents ars innocent?
pizzaequalspedo ago
Don't pretend you know what happened to her.
Torkimadi ago
It's quite obvious and the Portuguese police knew, until the highest U.K. Government agents took over the case "for some reason". Never mind the cadaver dog and blood dog, right? I mean, only the FBI uses them, they can't possibly be right.
They were protected by the uk government because they're part of a pedo ring, they killed her.
paulf ago
Except we know what DIDN'T happen and that's that someone abducted her. We know it didn't happen because the McCanns and their friends have repeatedly lied about basic facts and have refused to do a reconstruction, and because the two cadaver dogs that found corpse odor in the apartment and the hired car have a 100% record.
What does that leave?
samhara ago
If you don't trust the dogs it leaves that she could still be alive.
The fact the friends and family lied? How does that prove she wasn't abducted? It doesn't.
paulf ago
If you don't trust the dogs, then you're throwing out my whole argument. My statement was "the McCanns and their friends have repeatedly lied about basic facts and have refused to do a reconstruction, AND because the two cadaver dogs that found corpse odor in the apartment and the hired car have a 100% record."
It's all the things taken together that have the full force, not the one thing by itself. And I have lots of other evidence I haven't even mentioned yet.
samhara ago
Exactly. I lack faith in all these creeps, including the police and their dogs. And the Tabloids - though sometimes they come up with truth when other outlets do not;
(mostly because they can get away with it as many lack confidence in their reporting. so it doesn't matter if they tell the truth sometimes)
If there is more data I defer to you, who has spent much more time than I.
There's 2 parts to your argument here. A and B
A, they were all lying
This doesn't convince me she was killed
B. The dogs.
The dogs could also be another lie.
Does your whole argument hinge on the dog evidence? Is there more as you say? I'm open minded.
paulf ago
Here is a good place to start.
samhara ago
I don't click on links. So you can post the full url , if you will.
paulf ago
Sure. It's: https://idraintheswamp.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/madeleine-foundation-bookx.pdf
samhara ago
Taking a cursory look at "Best Evidence" there; and it's less than convincing.
"would have prompted an outpouring of grief and concern for their child. It would have 10 prompted reactions such as: Who hired the car before us?, or - Is anyone else known to have died in our apartment or in the hire car? "
The less than shocked reaction could easily be because they know she is alive.
As I see it, someone has a lot of interest in making people believe she is dead.. That .pdf you sent seems to have that object. The points are well - taken, in and of themselves, and I am open - minded. But why such a strong conviction when there should be open - mindness, especially after the Clinton emails surfaced?
The parents are obviously Crisis Actors.. It's a fable made on TV / Tabloids and Fake News , as are so many others.
Parents will always believe a child is alive if a dead body is missing.. that's known by detectives.
The fact they have failed to announce they believe she is dead, speaks more to their authenticity as parents than otherwise.
I find the "dog" story less than plausible. It's smells like human - interest Propaganda.. "The Hero Dog" 100% .
I may check again the "best evidence" as summarized in that .pdf. but so far it's weak.
" To those of us trained to look at form as well as content, the counter-stories also read like a script, or like a transparent effort at mind control"
samhara ago
thank you.