Pope Francis calls those who talk about pizzagate 'shit eaters':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gEqEutwLmU
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1514802
The real reason Pope Francis is lenient on pedos while against truthers on pizzagate is because of a document issued by Ratzinger (Cardinal then Pope Benedict XVI) when he was the "Grand Inquisitor"-- yes Grand Inquisitor (Torquemada was the first Grand Inquisitor).
Ratzinger was named by this survivor as being part of human hunting parties and ritual torture and murder of children:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1800676
He also avoided prosecution in a sex abuse case by claiming "diplomatic immunity" (because the Vatican is country with it's own currency central Rothschild bank, intelligence services etc.):
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/pope-seeks-immunity-over-sex-abuse-suit/2005/08/17/1123958097061.html
NB: Pope Benedict XVI was the first pope to resign in over 500 years, and the first to resign voluntarily in over 700 years. We might well ask why.
The obligatory red shoes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_shoes
The document Ratzinger was responsible for is called Crimen Sollicitationis (it's written in Latin).** It effectively silences those reporting pederasty by clergy no matter who they are, as well as the victims themselves under pain of excommunication.** Excommunication for a Catholic means eternity in hell. Even, nuns and priests who reported pedo clergy were not only defrocked but excommunicated.
Source: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crimen_Sollicitationis
Although articles, as on Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimen_sollicitationis)) say it is no longer in effect, the fact is by all accounts including their own in the same referenced article, it was simply replaced with another (secret) one in May of 2001.
This document came into the public consciousness due in part to media coverage of the pedo scandal.
Interviewed for a television program in 2006, canon lawyer Thomas Doyle described the tight secrecy demanded for the procedure [of investigating child rape, etc.] as "an explicit written policy to cover up cases of child sexual abuse by the clergy, to punish those who would call attention to these crimes by churchmen". This is a quotation from a (an ironically) BBC documentary on clergy sexual abuse in Ireland. While periodically removed from vimeo and YouTube, here is one I found today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcJT0b-gkIA
This is important because the it is this show which made Crimen Sollicitationis known among the general public.
This document has been used in American cases (which have been won to the tune of billions so far) against pedo priests.
https://ozatheist.wordpress.com/category/crimen-sollicitationis/
This document came into the public consciousness due in part to media coverage and the priest pedo scandal.
Parenthetically: This is not at all an indictment against Roman Catholic people or their faith. Please read this post according to it's relevance to pizzagate and institutional protection of pedophiles.
It is important to note that homosexuality among RC clergy is rife due in large part to the prohibition on marriage of priests after the great schism in the middle ages. After a thousand years of Christianity, when the RC decided to split from the original church and become a quite different and worldly organization, they sought to confiscate property and all assets of clergy as they had considerable wealth and land. Priests were ordered to divorce their wives and turn everything over to the Vatican. [The original church, the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, allowed and still allows married priests.]
view the rest of the comments →
Laskar ago
LoPhatt: unfortunately you seem very confused and somewhat hysterical. Who is bashing anyone? Facts speak for themselves.
Protestantism, which is a heresy derived from a heresy, has nothing to do with the Vatican's Crimen Sollicitationis or rampant pedophilia.There is no such thing as a smorgasbord of belief; that idea is a manifestation of syncretism or any of the delusions that perpetuate darkness. Only darkness fears the light of Truth.
I am well aware that there are many thousands of different Protestant denominations and I am aware of their complaints against the RC church, but I am no part of any of that. I honestly cannot fathom anyone subscribing to a "protest" rather than actual positive belief. Nor do I have anything to do with any cults.
I am interested in Truth.
I suppose Protestants, who are largely ignorant of any church history before the sixteenth century, imagine that Christ died on the cross so they can make Joyce Meyer, Joel Osteen, Benny Hinn into billionaires because they give motivational speeches to lazy, soft, idiots who are not following anything Christ actually said in the Gospels. But my post is not about Protestants, or the merits of any particular sect.
It might interest you to know that there is a pre-denominational Christian Church, which is not divided nor divisive. Back in the 80s when many mainline Protestant clergy were seeking a return to the "original church", they actually found it and returned to it, abandoning their heresies, for truth--whole denominations converted. In the Philippines, and even Mexico there have been mass defections from Roman Catholicism, and have turned to the original church as well. There are books written about this, and even YouTube vids, though you won't see it on MSM.
Facts are not ridicule. The fact that Vatican City is a country, with it's own currency, secret police, central bank, embassies, and ruler (Pope) is not ridicule. More facts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_City
Didn't Christ say, "My kingdom is not of this world" in the book of John chapter 18 verse 36? https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+18:36&version=NKJV
bopper ago
Huh? They were protesting the wicked ways of the Roman Church. Ah, never mind.
Laskar ago
Yes, they are and the Roman Catholic church is a heresy invented by men, which culminated in 1054.
It is now known that agents of the Medici (the Rothschilds of their day in every respect) bankrolled Luther and then the movement was taken over by other agents such as Calvin (real name Cohen), Melancthon, Knox etc.
I am not saying this lightly; I spent years studying books and manuscripts in the libraries of Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University.
bopper ago
I hear you, but there is a supernatural spiritual element to the men of the reformation that cannot be denied, they were subject to, and obedient to, a much higher power than the Rothschild's, they were martyrs that risked and lost their lives and property for what they believed. It was a work of God. They conquered their own sins, the greatest of battles. Here we can agree to disagree. Also, God can and does employ weak and wicked men to work his will (Rothschild's) ... I give them only a certain degree of credit, they are on a leash, God determines the length of that leash.