Trump mentions John Podesta three times in Martha Maccallum interview tonight on Fox. I seem to sense a distinct 'special' disgust when he mentions his name. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by GumShoe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NqMJq6nR_8

Here's the link. 16:26 is where he talks about Podesta. (Thanks to kplusk)

Trump mentioned Podesta & Brother in context of their dealings/business in Russia, but the body language and disgust at mention of his name struck me. (To confront confirmation bias, I'd like to hear what you all think as well.)

Anytime POTUS mentions John Podesta.... is automatically pizzagate related, Imo.

(Edited to add link to video).

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

If any single person does something, it won't be the president, for the simple fact that he has NO say in what gets investigated or prosecuted.

Among other things.

samhara ago

That's untrue . And a likely excuse / lie.

For one, he's the chief executive and Chief / Commander of the entire Armed Forces

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

The armed forces aren't part of the judicial branch...

samhara ago

Oh, but Clinton did treason. That's under the military.

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

No... The SOS isn't on the military chain of command...

samhara ago

He's the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces. Obama and Hillary are guilty of Treason. Figure it out.

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

The correct term is commander IN chief.

And you said she was guilty of treason related to military action.

That's impossible because she wasn't part of the military chain of command.

samhara ago

Secretary of State can be guilty of Treason.

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

Never said she couldn't.

Just pointing out she's not guilty of what you think she's guilty of.

samhara ago

So you imagine she is not guilty of treason?

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

When did I say that?

She's in a legal gray area with NATO in Libya, but treason is a bit of a stretch.