I don't know how you people come up with that interpretation that she's sending kids to a party to be raped by Podesta and other various Democrats. And you keep reposting this evil slander. I'm thinking it's the shill camp that keeps harping on this.
What is the crux of your post? Are you saying that she wasn't sending the kids to the party to be raped by Democrats? What is the insinuation then? I destroy dumb-play specialists. It's my specialty.
If I had anything to say beyond what is stated and shown in the post, I would have added it. If you want to ask me if I personally believe Podesta raped a child in the pool, I have to admit I've never really thought it that far through, and it wouldn't matter what I think anyway. The only thing I'm concerned with is the evidence, circumstantial and otherwise, that points to strange and concerning language being used with regard to children. And finally in the post we have actual evidence of a link to solicitation of child porn, or was that lost on you? Recognizing child porn is not part of your specialty?
So you have no insinuation about why she's sending the kids to that party but you made a post about it? But then you say you picked up something "strange" in the language that she used but you become bashful about explaining what that is once I make my charge about what you are insinuating. Wouldn't you say you are at least implying some shenanigans were going on with those children and the adults at that party? If you admit that then I'm gonna ask you what kind of shenanigans so be careful.
I think their own words in the emails and the blog lead to those questions. I think without an independent investigation these questions will taint the reputations of these people. The only thing that will clear these individual is a full investigation. But the last thing they want is an investigation. That is evident.
Then investigate and clear them of any wrong doing. Once the Miranda rights are read then they have the right to be presumed innocent. I am not sure why they would rather let all these doubts and questions surround them. Clearly they are hisding something. Innocent people welcome investigations.
view the rest of the comments →
The_Crux ago
I don't know how you people come up with that interpretation that she's sending kids to a party to be raped by Podesta and other various Democrats. And you keep reposting this evil slander. I'm thinking it's the shill camp that keeps harping on this.
V____Z ago
Exactly where in the world did this post say what you're quoting?
The_Crux ago
What is the crux of your post? Are you saying that she wasn't sending the kids to the party to be raped by Democrats? What is the insinuation then? I destroy dumb-play specialists. It's my specialty.
V____Z ago
If I had anything to say beyond what is stated and shown in the post, I would have added it. If you want to ask me if I personally believe Podesta raped a child in the pool, I have to admit I've never really thought it that far through, and it wouldn't matter what I think anyway. The only thing I'm concerned with is the evidence, circumstantial and otherwise, that points to strange and concerning language being used with regard to children. And finally in the post we have actual evidence of a link to solicitation of child porn, or was that lost on you? Recognizing child porn is not part of your specialty?
The_Crux ago
So you have no insinuation about why she's sending the kids to that party but you made a post about it? But then you say you picked up something "strange" in the language that she used but you become bashful about explaining what that is once I make my charge about what you are insinuating. Wouldn't you say you are at least implying some shenanigans were going on with those children and the adults at that party? If you admit that then I'm gonna ask you what kind of shenanigans so be careful.
Forgetmenot ago
I think their own words in the emails and the blog lead to those questions. I think without an independent investigation these questions will taint the reputations of these people. The only thing that will clear these individual is a full investigation. But the last thing they want is an investigation. That is evident.
PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago
And there we have it. The goal of Pizzagate is to ruin reputations by sticking to the motto "guilty until proven innocent".
Forgetmenot ago
Then investigate and clear them of any wrong doing. Once the Miranda rights are read then they have the right to be presumed innocent. I am not sure why they would rather let all these doubts and questions surround them. Clearly they are hisding something. Innocent people welcome investigations.