You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

"freedom of speech on topics like sex"

Where did I say the guy isn't allowed to speak?

You should be smart enough to know what a Straw Man is given the "UK" in your username. And you just built a doozy. You can't attack my argument which is fucking children is wrong. So what do you do? Why you make this about free speech and then try to brow beat me into submission.

That sex educator has every right to give that talk. And I would fight to the death to make sure he will always have that right. But guess what, free speech goes both ways. I get to come here and make fun of his idiot ass. That's MY right.

I don't know how you ended up here but your comment is odd as fuck. It's very close to accusing me of "Hate Speech" which is the Left's polite way of robbing someone's right to express his opinions.

"In the future Fascists will be called anti-Fascists." - DarkMath

;-)

DerivaUK ago

Ignoring your misplaced quotation, I was merely making an observation about the video regarding the use of metaphor in regard to sexual reference and speech and making the comparison about our differing cultural restrictions. No attack or refutation of your argument was either implied or intended. Nor similarly any accusation of hate speech. Indeed, we agree on your fundamental premises that fucking children is wrong and the right of this man to say what he wants is worthy of a battle to the death. However, I will argue that the right to call him an idiot is not yours exclusively. There was no informal fallacy here. I was not arguing with your statement, my comment was purely observational, as stated. Maybe you're shill weary and it's maybe making you hyper touchy, for your apparent "counter attack" was not justified given that there was no attack from me (or even argument) in the first place. I have respect for you, in truth.

DarkMath ago

"Ignoring your misplaced quotation"

Misplaced? You didn't know that Churchill didn't say that?

Regarding the remainder of your comment I can tell you're highly educated, English and possess a high verbal aptitude which basically means you could "concern troll" a vulture off a meat truck. I think if you go back and look at what you wrote again you'll acknowledge use of the words "taboo" and "censorship" along with the freedom of speech line we just talked about all add up to a "Begging the Question" fallacy where in this case you put down "taboo", "censorship", and "freedom of speech" and pray the reader starts to feel like a deplorable shit lord.

But the problem is I'm American and can spot your ruse that I'm pretty sure you can't even see yourself and you wrote it.

Whiiiiiiiiiich gets to my final point, the problem isn't criticizing a man for slinging around an idea that's so wrong and morally repugnant my teeth hurt.

The problem is you're English. In England evidently you're too polite to call a spade a spade. Isn't that the English way? Be polite at all costs?

But why and for what? There is no reason. The English aren't polite, they're afraid. The aristocratic class has brow beaten you poor sods for so long it's still part of your culture even though your aristocracy went the way of the doe-doe.

It's time to break your shackles random English guy I'm talking to on the Interwebs. We did it a little over 225 years ago and it feels sublime.

Free your mind and your ass will follow.

:-D

educate_yourself ago

yo math i usually respect and appreciate your shit greatly but honestly, when i read their comment and read it again it doesnt really come across to me like they are arguing with you... more making an observation. i would be on the fence except the last sentence seems to support you, ykno? im not a shill and im certainly not a concern troll or anything else and i could so easily be wrong but i got a pretty decent education and perhaps its just the language itself that is off putting or how it reads to you? i could be wrong deriva could be shilling or w.e but it just didnt really read that way to me. either way always enjoy ur cmoments

DarkMath ago

Have you ever been to the UK?

educate_yourself ago

what youre saying is bc they are from the uk and so wishy washy its bs? nah, i havent

DarkMath ago

In the UK or anywhere in Europe for that matter there's still residual respect for the aristocratic class a.k.a. the elites. The average peon was abused and brow beaten for so long they've forgotten how to resist. Us Americans haven't, in fact we've been rolling back the 1% for 250 years. Admittedly the elites took back some territory starting in about 1963 but that's about to come back to haunt them in spades. They're about to receive a grievous chastisement of their own making I doubt any of them quite realize the power of yet.

In short DevianUK has no point or argument whatsoever. Busting the TED talk speaker's balls for being a Stage 5 pervert and a douche bag is exactly what's required, politeness be damned.

educate_yourself ago

bro over the last 250 years they have stolen and gained more grround than any other time in MODERN ACCEPTED HISTORY. likely our modern history is a fucking sham and a lot more has been going on for a lot longer but at least in modern times they have exponentially grown since 1800s. every depression they double or tripled from 1700s to today. i hope you are right but the bottom line is america was founded by the very same occultists that took over everywhere else and anyone who fought back like andrew jackson was forcibly stopped.

yo i agree with you that ted shit was gross i was just saying the person didnt come across to me as trying to shut u down. i may be looking at it wrong tho u know? i sure hope the ruling class get shitkicked. i have my doubts about 1963 im currently engaged in a tough convo on here about it

DarkMath ago

" i have my doubts about 1963"

What makes you doubt it was a conspiracy?

There is no question it was a conspiracy. Even Congress finally admitted that fact.

educate_yourself ago

i dont doubt it was a conspiracy i just have my questions about jfk's complicity and a few other things

DarkMath ago

"just have my questions about jfk's complicity and a few other things"

Like what?

educate_yourself ago

ok so heres the bottom line for me. ive researched this for long enough that i have a hard time believing jfk got where he was and was takingadv of women like he was and fuking illuminati mk beta kittens like he was with his familly without being complicit in their shit. which maeks me question stuff plus his being elevated to this like deity status or w.e and being used as a symbol for good........ makes me wonder

DarkMath ago

"like he was with his familly without being complicit in their shit."

You're conflating two separate issues. The first being the fact the Joe Kennedy Sr was Irish Mafia, he was. And the second being that fact meant he would have taken America down an equally albeit different path towards destruction.

H.W. Bush and JFK were both mafia, Yale vs Irish respectively. That doesn't mean JFK was anywhere near as evil as H.W.. They were both bought and paid for, it's just one wanted to execute a Fascist takeover.

educate_yourself ago

what we are seeing is two competing groups i guess but for me the bottom line is they are bound by occult connections and whatnot. what is the kennedy bloodline? https://www.google.ca/search?q=kennedy+bloodline&oq=kennedy+bloodline&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i61j69i59l3.4809j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 what doest his mean? that even though many of them may have been murdered, theyve mostly shown to be corrupt like any other. im not saying he wasnt killed i just dont know and there is enough room for me to question the validity especially considering alts main piece of evidence as to his character is basically a misrepresentation when you listen to the entire 20 minuteespeech or however long it was............ idk man, i just dont feel the sadness and true loss that i used to beecause i canthelp but question the 2nd biggest mass ritual on american soil. u feel me?

DarkMath ago

Nope. You lost me.