II didn't see this in any of the articles yesterday, but then again, they did all see to be running the same story about how wonderful she was .. and she might have been, but there was a disturbing thing she did. It was to extend rights to non-biological parents. While this ruling helped same-sex couples, it really granted the right of someone to have rights to a child that a biological parent might not want to have rights. Especially a creepy someone . http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/4/13/15286272/sheila-abdus-salaam-death-first-black-woman-judge-new-york
Also, NYP promptly said no foul play was suspected. Really ? On an alleged drowning victim, isn't it up to the Coroner to determine time of and method of death ?
You'd think. I think they even try to make it look believable, anymore. I wonder what she did. Whether she outlived her usefulness, made a mistake, or was having a change of heart (that's doubtful)?
view the rest of the comments →
quantokitty ago
Nice. Upvoat for you.
II didn't see this in any of the articles yesterday, but then again, they did all see to be running the same story about how wonderful she was .. and she might have been, but there was a disturbing thing she did. It was to extend rights to non-biological parents. While this ruling helped same-sex couples, it really granted the right of someone to have rights to a child that a biological parent might not want to have rights. Especially a creepy someone . http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/4/13/15286272/sheila-abdus-salaam-death-first-black-woman-judge-new-york
remedy4reality ago
Also, NYP promptly said no foul play was suspected. Really ? On an alleged drowning victim, isn't it up to the Coroner to determine time of and method of death ?
quantokitty ago
You'd think. I think they even try to make it look believable, anymore. I wonder what she did. Whether she outlived her usefulness, made a mistake, or was having a change of heart (that's doubtful)?