You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

Yes, by all means. Let's drop the pretense of concern and weaponize the power of group conjecture to smear our enemies. Let's drop the mask and kick off the third stage of moral panics and witch hunts where wild charges are hurled at any and all. Let's have our investigation be driven by hostility and vengeance.

That won't reflect badly on this community at all. Let's burn some witches. Or even better, let's burn some people who question how judgement about who is a witch.

V____Z ago

Well that's a nice rant and all, but Twitter has been banning people for speaking truth for a while now, and Jack has been called out for it.

People found these tweets to be a bit odd https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0KtDxxXUAAcNdp.jpg

They also found that his support, and even fundraising for Hillary, resulted in censorship on her behalf.

As well, Twitter's biggest funder is a Saudi prince http://www.carbonated.tv/news/saudi-prince-alwaleed-bin-talal-twitter-stake

Are_we_sure ago

People found these tweets to be a bit odd

That's a perfect example of what I'm talking about Have you never heard of the witch hunt regarding The Satanic Verses? The Ayatollah Khomeini sentenced the author to die for blasphemy. And you think it might be good to use in a smear job.

Also Twitter is a public company since 2013. This guy owns 5%. Explain why I should be scared