I used to see her comment a lot on his videos. Can't remember her name, but IIRC she used to have conversations back n forth with that bipolar "Ladonna Rae" character. I remember thinking it was odd (if I am correct and it was her) bc everyone else was blocking that person bc they were always shitstirring.
The one thing I would add is that I've twice emailed GW with good info and received no response. I actually sent one yesterday just to check if I had the correct email before sending the info, which included pics and video of one of his targeted areas of research, and received no reply. I simply follow the solid leads out there that are links to actual articles he posts. The "educated guesses" he takes I take w a grain of salt.
I caught him saying 2 things that weren't true, and gave him the benefit of the doubt since everyone was so hot for him. I figured he'd want to clear up his mistakes in a follow up video, as any of us would do if we were corrected on any point. Nope. He sidestepped and shimmied in response (via Twitter). Truth is not his number one priority. I have a feeling it's to distract and mislead PG researchers.
view the rest of the comments →
Freemasonsrus ago
I used to see her comment a lot on his videos. Can't remember her name, but IIRC she used to have conversations back n forth with that bipolar "Ladonna Rae" character. I remember thinking it was odd (if I am correct and it was her) bc everyone else was blocking that person bc they were always shitstirring.
The one thing I would add is that I've twice emailed GW with good info and received no response. I actually sent one yesterday just to check if I had the correct email before sending the info, which included pics and video of one of his targeted areas of research, and received no reply. I simply follow the solid leads out there that are links to actual articles he posts. The "educated guesses" he takes I take w a grain of salt.
V____Z ago
I caught him saying 2 things that weren't true, and gave him the benefit of the doubt since everyone was so hot for him. I figured he'd want to clear up his mistakes in a follow up video, as any of us would do if we were corrected on any point. Nope. He sidestepped and shimmied in response (via Twitter). Truth is not his number one priority. I have a feeling it's to distract and mislead PG researchers.
equineluvr ago
"Hot" for him is right! My theory: All the grandmas on here have the hots for him because he has hair.
V____Z ago
He creeps me right the fuck out. But I guess some women go for that predator/footballdude/bully look...