First time I vowed the Half-pig/ Who-knows what in the hell that it is...I threw up. This is the most disturbing things I have ever seen. To combine them with children is sickening. This is depraved.
Perhaps that's the point. Human pig hybrids are a real thing (google "human pig chimera") They look like pigs IRL but here they are artistically displayed in a kind of "genetic realism" and it is upsetting. Perhaps her work is geared toward asking the question "is this something we should be doing?" Because we are doing it. I mean it's not as straight forward as it seems. I'm against it... until I need a heart transplant.
Yes I realize that. They are already growing organs in pigs. Modern art is created by CIA most often or operatives and pushed into society. It is what they are already doing and trying to desensitize others to it. Tony Podesta admiring it is like him hanging pictures of ritually abused children & statues of Dahmer's victim in his house. Admiring the perverse and victims. Watching trauma happen and calling it art.
That is what pornography is in some sense. Watching trauma in action from a computer.
Tony & elites just sit in an audience and call it art or in private participate?
I've seen evidence of pedophilia. I've seen evidence of SRA. I've seen evidence that some artists are depicting pedophilia and selling their crappy art for big money. I haven't seen evidence that an entire art movement was "created" by the CIA. At best they jumped on the bandwagon and saw a means for laundering money.
Not all CIA, but yes modern art was created by them in the sense that that the subjects of human experiments and victims began creating images and projections of their experience.
Do you really think a human being not subjected to trauma or some strange events would paint pictures of children being sexually abused? As in Tony Podesta's house? Does someone create these creatures out of nowhere?
This is projection. These are the dark sickening stories of victims. If these were painted, drawn, or sculpted in a therapeutic center psychologists would test for severe trauma, for SRA!
The fact that no one not even leading psychologists, psychiatrists are speaking out loud is shocking. And there are specific reasons for that.
I think you are creating in your mind a sub-set of all modern art. In this subset you put the nasty, perverse and twisted artworks of deranged or traumatized or the simple and mindless crap of money laundering art (i.e. "burned toast on a china plate" selling for $45,000). I'll give you a "maybe" on that one. But modern art is more than that and to call one the other is wrong and unsupportable.
Okay will give you that. Not all or nothing am not trying to say that at all. Just looking back at historical art or many other art forms there are of course different meanings.
Just pointing out that "perverse, twisted, traumatized" being called "art" by actual perverse and twisted human beings is dangerous. They are placing value on the damage they cause.
For instance in Tony's house he has paintings everywhere from an admitted survivor of Satanic Ritual Abuse. He does not have them in a collection dedicated to the eradication of eliminating child sexual abuse where he has donated the money to a fund.
He has them displayed. They are a trophy and are in essence a look into what some perverse, twisted predators did to that child.
All these people have charities. Who has one for rescuing child trafficking victims in Washington DC or Va. or can the NCMEC make a public statement.
view the rest of the comments →
Jem777 ago
First time I vowed the Half-pig/ Who-knows what in the hell that it is...I threw up. This is the most disturbing things I have ever seen. To combine them with children is sickening. This is depraved.
burnerdrone04 ago
Perhaps that's the point. Human pig hybrids are a real thing (google "human pig chimera") They look like pigs IRL but here they are artistically displayed in a kind of "genetic realism" and it is upsetting. Perhaps her work is geared toward asking the question "is this something we should be doing?" Because we are doing it. I mean it's not as straight forward as it seems. I'm against it... until I need a heart transplant.
Jem777 ago
Yes I realize that. They are already growing organs in pigs. Modern art is created by CIA most often or operatives and pushed into society. It is what they are already doing and trying to desensitize others to it. Tony Podesta admiring it is like him hanging pictures of ritually abused children & statues of Dahmer's victim in his house. Admiring the perverse and victims. Watching trauma happen and calling it art.
That is what pornography is in some sense. Watching trauma in action from a computer. Tony & elites just sit in an audience and call it art or in private participate?
burnerdrone04 ago
I've seen evidence of pedophilia. I've seen evidence of SRA. I've seen evidence that some artists are depicting pedophilia and selling their crappy art for big money. I haven't seen evidence that an entire art movement was "created" by the CIA. At best they jumped on the bandwagon and saw a means for laundering money.
Jem777 ago
Not all CIA, but yes modern art was created by them in the sense that that the subjects of human experiments and victims began creating images and projections of their experience.
Do you really think a human being not subjected to trauma or some strange events would paint pictures of children being sexually abused? As in Tony Podesta's house? Does someone create these creatures out of nowhere?
This is projection. These are the dark sickening stories of victims. If these were painted, drawn, or sculpted in a therapeutic center psychologists would test for severe trauma, for SRA!
The fact that no one not even leading psychologists, psychiatrists are speaking out loud is shocking. And there are specific reasons for that.
burnerdrone04 ago
I think you are creating in your mind a sub-set of all modern art. In this subset you put the nasty, perverse and twisted artworks of deranged or traumatized or the simple and mindless crap of money laundering art (i.e. "burned toast on a china plate" selling for $45,000). I'll give you a "maybe" on that one. But modern art is more than that and to call one the other is wrong and unsupportable.
Jem777 ago
Okay will give you that. Not all or nothing am not trying to say that at all. Just looking back at historical art or many other art forms there are of course different meanings.
Just pointing out that "perverse, twisted, traumatized" being called "art" by actual perverse and twisted human beings is dangerous. They are placing value on the damage they cause.
For instance in Tony's house he has paintings everywhere from an admitted survivor of Satanic Ritual Abuse. He does not have them in a collection dedicated to the eradication of eliminating child sexual abuse where he has donated the money to a fund.
He has them displayed. They are a trophy and are in essence a look into what some perverse, twisted predators did to that child.
All these people have charities. Who has one for rescuing child trafficking victims in Washington DC or Va. or can the NCMEC make a public statement.