Natgeo editors know exactly what's going on. You can't possibly tell me that a world class magazine KNOWN for their photography had NO idea what this shit is about? They get off on having this shoved in our faces. Like this? https://imgoat.com/uploads/512bd43d9c/10340.JPG
I own that issue and never thought of it like that. I just are a happy girl, and I think you're pretty sick that saying she is sexual. People like you are the reason we can't have nice things as a society. Always trying to add a different dimension to something that isn't there. Bitching just to bitch.....
And you should learn how to write and spell English. People like you are the morons who don't question anything about society and thus let it deteriorate to the mess we're in--where we're giving life-altering and irreversible hormone blockers to little kids because we're telling them they're in the wrong body. Children ARE PERFECT IN THE BODIES THEY HAVE. THERE IS NOTHING 'WRONG' WITH THEM. Why aren't we teaching our children that it's okay for boys to like pink and for girls to be butch? We're so fucking homophobic we can't stand the thought that little Johnnie may be gay or little Jessica might be a lesbian. So Douggie, I hope you have no children. And go fuck yourself.
You're fucking retarded because I never said I agreed or disagreed with the idea of kids changing genders. I actually think its pretty sick and do think it should be illegal until they are 18 and their MIMD is fully developed. What I called you out on was trying to say that Nat Geo was sexualizing that girl/boy and adding controversy to something that is totally innocent. So my bad if I made a spelling error while typing fast on my phone, but you obviously have zero reading comprehension skills and only a demented fuck like you would look at that innocent picture of that girl and think about sex, you and the rest of the distorted feminists living like we are still I'm the 1920s.
Okay, so now I get your problem. If I'm a 'demented fuck' for thinking that child was being sexualised, then the world is full of 'demented fucks' because that's what just about everybody else sees. That is NOT the stance of an innocent child. And while you defend what NatGeo did with that child, you are defending the whole trans cult pushing men into girls' change rooms, confusing and pathologising little children about 'gender'; supporting a multi-billion dollar medical industry whose financial interests are served by abusing children. And yes, you're still a moron who needs to go fuck himself.
Every feminist that hasn't shaved their cooter in months may of thought that just to how on the bandwagon because they ran outoc things to bitch at that week
view the rest of the comments →
Trs0817 ago
Natgeo editors know exactly what's going on. You can't possibly tell me that a world class magazine KNOWN for their photography had NO idea what this shit is about? They get off on having this shoved in our faces. Like this? https://imgoat.com/uploads/512bd43d9c/10340.JPG
Piscina ago
Hate this cover. They are exploiting this child, who is made to look sexual with her/his come hither look. A pedophile's dream. http://www.feministcurrent.com/2016/12/16/national-geographic-gender-revolution-cover-fails-women/
dougG ago
I own that issue and never thought of it like that. I just are a happy girl, and I think you're pretty sick that saying she is sexual. People like you are the reason we can't have nice things as a society. Always trying to add a different dimension to something that isn't there. Bitching just to bitch.....
Piscina ago
And you should learn how to write and spell English. People like you are the morons who don't question anything about society and thus let it deteriorate to the mess we're in--where we're giving life-altering and irreversible hormone blockers to little kids because we're telling them they're in the wrong body. Children ARE PERFECT IN THE BODIES THEY HAVE. THERE IS NOTHING 'WRONG' WITH THEM. Why aren't we teaching our children that it's okay for boys to like pink and for girls to be butch? We're so fucking homophobic we can't stand the thought that little Johnnie may be gay or little Jessica might be a lesbian. So Douggie, I hope you have no children. And go fuck yourself.
dougG ago
You're fucking retarded because I never said I agreed or disagreed with the idea of kids changing genders. I actually think its pretty sick and do think it should be illegal until they are 18 and their MIMD is fully developed. What I called you out on was trying to say that Nat Geo was sexualizing that girl/boy and adding controversy to something that is totally innocent. So my bad if I made a spelling error while typing fast on my phone, but you obviously have zero reading comprehension skills and only a demented fuck like you would look at that innocent picture of that girl and think about sex, you and the rest of the distorted feminists living like we are still I'm the 1920s.
Piscina ago
you and the rest of the distorted feminists
Okay, so now I get your problem. If I'm a 'demented fuck' for thinking that child was being sexualised, then the world is full of 'demented fucks' because that's what just about everybody else sees. That is NOT the stance of an innocent child. And while you defend what NatGeo did with that child, you are defending the whole trans cult pushing men into girls' change rooms, confusing and pathologising little children about 'gender'; supporting a multi-billion dollar medical industry whose financial interests are served by abusing children. And yes, you're still a moron who needs to go fuck himself.
dougG ago
Every feminist that hasn't shaved their cooter in months may of thought that just to how on the bandwagon because they ran outoc things to bitch at that week
Piscina ago
Thanks for proving you're an imbecile
dougG ago
At least I didn't get all downvoats..