You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

HamstaRapper ago

She sent an email to Podesta that she's sending her kids over as entertainment. However a rational explanation is she listed their ages because that's something that they should know and be prepared for, and by "entertainment" she really meant "pain in the ass". Another explanation is by entertainment she was referring to the adults in the sense of "entertain a guest" (hospitality), and it's import to know the ages of any children [a cynic might say it's important to know so they can hide their soft bondage kiddie artwork].

They found a personal blog of the mother that had pictures of those kids. Alefantis looks like he might be in one of them, but others in this thread think it's not him.

druhill007 ago

Ha. Good luck going down the path of trying to rationalize the innocence of overall ties... Explaining away 1 email is sort of possible... But it just gets harder and harder to go beyond rationalizing a few of the puzzle pieces.

FOR EXAMPLE. What what this woman doing selling Skype sessions with these kids?

If that example doesn't release you from the rationalization well guess what, there a shitload more :)

VieBleu ago

good effort and it has to be made. We forget how encountering this still makes people question in shock.

Mad_As_Hell ago

I agree, how do you explain Evie's Crib and the "raw and uncut" line in an innocent way?