You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ArthurEdens ago

I think he's saying the sale of the Rembrandts were a cover for organ trafficking

andrevandelft ago

I am not. The sale may be just a sale; maybe for a too high a price. Maybe it is a way to transfer money to the Clinton Foundation or so via De Rothschild. Probably not, but that is where my fantasy ends.

With Kaplan's Leiden Collection I have even less an idea what this could be. But like with my article on the UNICEF case that I referred to, I had no idea either.

IMO it is important to collect raw data even if it is only slightly suspicious; at some point it may come of use.

ArthurEdens ago

I respect you for not jumping to conclusions and just reporting what you found. You probably know paying way too much for something is a technique for money laundering and trafficking. The Louvre having that pyramid makes me suspicious too.