This woman says Hillary smeared her and used dishonest tactics to successfully get her attacker off with a light sentence—even though, she claims, Clinton knew he was guilty.
The victim in the 1975 sexual abuse case that became Clinton’s first criminal defense case as a 27-year-old lawyer has only spoken to the media once since her attack, a contested, short interaction with a reporter in 2008, during Clinton’s last presidential campaign run. Now 52, she wants to speak out after hearing Clinton talk about her case on newly discovered audio recordings from the 1980s, unearthed by the Washington Free Beacon and made public this week.
In a long, emotional interview with The Daily Beast, she accused Clinton of intentionally lying about her in court documents, going to extraordinary lengths to discredit evidence of the rape, and later callously acknowledging and laughing about her attackers’ guilt on the recordings.
“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said. The Daily Beast agreed to withhold her name out of concern for her privacy as a victim of sexual assault.
The victim said if she saw Clinton today, she would call her out for what she sees as the hypocrisy of Clinton’s current campaign to fight for women’s rights compared to her actions regarding this rape case so long ago.
“I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.”
The victim’s allegation that Clinton smeared her following her rape is based on a May 1975 court affidavit written by Clinton on behalf of Thomas Alfred Taylor, one of the two alleged attackers, whom Clinton agreed to defend after being asked by the prosecutor. Taylor had specifically requested a female attorney.
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
Clinton also wrote that a child psychologist told her that children in early adolescence “tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” especially when they come from “disorganized families, such as the complainant.”
The victim vigorously denied Clinton’s accusations and said there has never been any explanation of what Clinton was referring to in that affidavit. She claims she never accused anyone of attacking her before her rape.
“I’ve never said that about anyone. I don’t know why she said that. I have never made false allegations. I know she was lying,” she said. “I definitely didn’t see older men. I don’t know why Hillary put that in there and it makes me plumb mad.”
The Clintons (and their close associates, the Weiners, Epstein and Podesta) don't seem to have normal reactions to child abuse and pedorapists, which is: revulsion, anger, and the urge to protect innocents. But Putin is the bad guy.
view the rest of the comments →
rwb ago
Ok. V___Z, don't speak in code and leave a puzzle for use to solve. State your latest Jones complaint explicitly, so I can dismantle it just like I've dismantled all your other posts attempting to vilify Jones.
Newfind ago
I know you didn't ask me, but if V____Z is implying AJ is a lardass I agree.
rwb ago
I think you should read this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1754846/8595738/10#8595738
and this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1758830/8613550/10#8613550
Newfind ago
I appreciate where you're coming from I really do used to be a big fan of Alex Jones was for a long time . But after his Pierce Morgan appearance where he had a real opportunity to wake people up instead he turns into a ranting raving lunatic and alienate a normal audience therefore look making anyone who associate with him look crazy which is why they associated the CPP shooter with him because it serves their narrative and by association makes the shooter look crazy. I saw him for a while he was a sensationalist at the least and Bill Hicks at the most.
V____Z ago
And prior to that, this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3s0vAwsBNc
rwb ago
Finding mistakes made by a man who has been fighting on so many fronts for over twenty years is easy when there is literally thousands of hours of footage and thousands of individual stories.
V____Z ago
That's not a mistake, and that you could call an intentional disturbance of a rally a "mistake" in your obsessive defense of Alex Jones gives me no reason to read anything else you've got to say.
rwb ago
Your mistake is denying the truth that Jones has done more to bring the story of elites raping and torturing children to the masses than any other person living or dead.
V____Z ago
Now you're admitting you don't know who Ted Gunderson is?
rwb ago
"Now you're admitting you don't know who Ted Gunderson is? "
??? Gunderson was a regular on Jones's show, and a friend. Jones talks about Gunderson probably once a week, or at least twice a month for the last twenty years. That's around three hundred times by my reckoning that he's mentioned the incredible work of Gunderson. However, I am extremely grateful that you continue to build my case that you don't have a flying clue about what you're talking about.
V____Z ago
Ya got me. Alex JONES ROCKS