If Podesta bros., Clintons, etc., were actually investigated (which would likely lead to arrests) as Jones clearly lobbies for passionately every single time he touches on PG, do you really think JA would escape scrutiny because of anything Jones might have said? Do you really believe Jones's saying Alefantis is not a suspect is going to have an impact on any actual investigations?

Jones has done the very best he could after being set up through a ridiculously fake Comet Ping Pong menu passed to one of his ace reporters that overtly listed children for sale including those which were lame from previous torture, the story of which was broadcast on twitter under Infowars banner. I can barely believe you cannot see the utility or rather necessity in Jones's tactic of exculpating Alefantis because of this ruse and yet still keeping everyone else in play.

If you could throw some magical switch and have every high profile pedophile in the D.C. area arrested tomorrow with the one condition that Alefantis, assuming he's guilty, would get away, would you do it? One can only infer it's all or nothing for you, which is not smart or realistic.

What you're suggesting would be exactly the same as finding fault in a prosecutor who cuts a deal with one pedophile when same reveals the names and produces evidence against nineteen other pedophiles at the top of the food chain. By your rationale, the prosecutor would be a disgrace for letting the one get away instead of going after all twenty on principle and losing nineteen through acquittals because the evidence from the one willing to testify against the nineteen was unavailable to be exploited. Man, you are one piss poor tactician.

See my comment here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1754846