This woman says Hillary smeared her and used dishonest tactics to successfully get her attacker off with a light sentence—even though, she claims, Clinton knew he was guilty.
The victim in the 1975 sexual abuse case that became Clinton’s first criminal defense case as a 27-year-old lawyer has only spoken to the media once since her attack, a contested, short interaction with a reporter in 2008, during Clinton’s last presidential campaign run. Now 52, she wants to speak out after hearing Clinton talk about her case on newly discovered audio recordings from the 1980s, unearthed by the Washington Free Beacon and made public this week.
In a long, emotional interview with The Daily Beast, she accused Clinton of intentionally lying about her in court documents, going to extraordinary lengths to discredit evidence of the rape, and later callously acknowledging and laughing about her attackers’ guilt on the recordings.
“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said. The Daily Beast agreed to withhold her name out of concern for her privacy as a victim of sexual assault.
The victim said if she saw Clinton today, she would call her out for what she sees as the hypocrisy of Clinton’s current campaign to fight for women’s rights compared to her actions regarding this rape case so long ago.
“I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.”
The victim’s allegation that Clinton smeared her following her rape is based on a May 1975 court affidavit written by Clinton on behalf of Thomas Alfred Taylor, one of the two alleged attackers, whom Clinton agreed to defend after being asked by the prosecutor. Taylor had specifically requested a female attorney.
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
Clinton also wrote that a child psychologist told her that children in early adolescence “tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” especially when they come from “disorganized families, such as the complainant.”
The victim vigorously denied Clinton’s accusations and said there has never been any explanation of what Clinton was referring to in that affidavit. She claims she never accused anyone of attacking her before her rape.
“I’ve never said that about anyone. I don’t know why she said that. I have never made false allegations. I know she was lying,” she said. “I definitely didn’t see older men. I don’t know why Hillary put that in there and it makes me plumb mad.”
The Clintons (and their close associates, the Weiners, Epstein and Podesta) don't seem to have normal reactions to child abuse and pedorapists, which is: revulsion, anger, and the urge to protect innocents. But Putin is the bad guy.
view the rest of the comments →
rwb ago
Ok. V___Z, don't speak in code and leave a puzzle for use to solve. State your latest Jones complaint explicitly, so I can dismantle it just like I've dismantled all your other posts attempting to vilify Jones.
V____Z ago
Code?? I literally linked to it in the post, but here it is again https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1754108/8591216
rwb ago
So let me make sure I've got it right. Jones may have told the story of Clinton defending a rapist not quite correctly, but you want to tie him to the whipping post for avoiding an imbroglio because he was set up through Joe Biggs via a fake CPP menu offering maimed children for further torture? Further, Jones has discussed that famous Clinton case probably 500 times in the last twenty years, and I'd wager he got it right on at least a few occasions.
V____Z ago
NOT QUITE CORRECTLY?
If you are going to remain a jones fan regardless of the facts, I have no problem with that. But don't troll all my posts and comments with bullshit. It's getting tiresome.
rwb ago
Here's facts brother. Jones has done more to tell the story of child kidnapping, satanic torture, and snuff films over the last twenty-two years than any other person living or dead. Jones is the preeminent speaker on this subject, saying what no one else would say on terrestrial radio over and over and over and over and over again. He is the virtual Godfather of the effort to bring the sordid truth to the world. His track record in this very specific regard is f*****g astonishing, and you are a disgrace for not at the very least giving him credit for this. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1754846/8595738/10#8595738
V____Z ago
He is a limited hangout of the highest order with half his family, including his dad, in the CIA. Be careful.