Think this has something to do with PG?? Pelosi, et al., against new bill to allow ISP's to sell browsing data (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Judgejewdy

https://www.engadget.com/2017/03/28/us-house-votes-to-let-isps-sell-your-browser-history/

Pelosi response:

http://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/32817-3/

A search of voat and/or cursory review of Pelosi reveals that she is knee deep in PG. This may be wishful thinking, but how do you think this new bill could be used to out these bastards? I just find it curious that big brother Pelosi has issues with selling data that we already know the govt has access to (Ie none of our info is private). Discussions please!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VIrginiaPerson ago

Thanks for bringing up this thought. I noticed that the Trump admin was for it and that seemed curious to me. Now knowing Pelosi is against it that makes me more curious. On the outside it sounds bad but maybe it's good in a way we can't see yet.

KnightsofHubris ago

I noticed that the Trump admin was for it and that seemed curious to me. Now knowing Pelosi is against it that makes me more curious.

There's nothing curious about this one. The Democrats are on the right side of this issue and the Republicans are not. They are listening to the contributions of broadband companies who would make a ton of money selling this info and targeting ads to you. The guy who know heads the FCC was put in that position by Trump and first recommended to the board by Mitch McConnell. The FCC has five commissioners. 3 from one major party and two from the other. Right now two seats are vacant and it's 2-1 in favor of Republicans.

I have one question. They are not selling individual info, right? It wouldn't be Bob likes to post on Voat and he watches Big Bang Theory and drives a Mazda. It would X from St Louis posts on Voat...... ......Mazda. Anyone know?

DarkMath ago

"The Democrats are on the right side of this issue and the Republicans are not."

That's what I thought at first too. But there's one thing that changed my mind. If Trump and Sessions have the browsing history of some of these perps it may lead to more evidence of corruption.

Also it could be the browsing history won't be admissible in court until we officially make it legal again to access someone's browsing history.

equineluvr ago

"If Trump and Sessions have the browsing history of some of these perps"

POTUs does not investigate crimes, you dipshit.

DarkMath ago

Whatever you say horsefucker.

Judgejewdy ago

This is what I'm wondering! The case has to be air tight, not sure how else to get records when the aholes are in charge of all the data.