I really wish I could know who that poster is because he is everywhere posting the same stuff. Although it could be a team of shills that have similar names.
Lol. Check the ban list. He has dozens of names. A better question is, why aren't more people downvoating him? That's how Voat is designed to handle such things.
Nope. I did the debunking myself in a conversation with another mod.
Name something and I can probably provide a more sensible and alternative explanation, and tell you why the sticky is (possibly deliberately) ignoring contradictory information.
I'll give you a freebee: The Arch of Hysteria is not in the same pose as the body in the photograph Jeffery Dahmer took of his victim, and the photo was taken before the victim was beheaded. It's also impossible to understand how the artist of the statue (who has never stated that it was inspired by Dahmer) had access to police crime photos before the Internet, since the statue was sculpted in 1993.
And yet this is still used as "evidence". It's nonsense.
Same goes for the other "disturbing art". None of the actual fucked-up paintings from the one artist are in Podesta's house, but you use the other artwork she's created as evidence that Podesta is some kind of sick puppy.
Ridiculous. But hey, don't let me inspire you to change your information.
view the rest of the comments →
MostPostersAreShills ago
Lol I had a feeling someone would think that. Its just DJ Khaleds son hes a nice kid cmon.
MyNameIsLuka ago
And you just found the shill.
MostPostersAreShills ago
I really wish I could know who that poster is because he is everywhere posting the same stuff. Although it could be a team of shills that have similar names.
Vindicator ago
Lol. Check the ban list. He has dozens of names. A better question is, why aren't more people downvoating him? That's how Voat is designed to handle such things.
PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago
A better question is why don't you update your sticky posts when things get debunked?
Vindicator ago
Oh? Was something debunked? What? Gotta link?
PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago
Nope. I did the debunking myself in a conversation with another mod.
Name something and I can probably provide a more sensible and alternative explanation, and tell you why the sticky is (possibly deliberately) ignoring contradictory information.
I'll give you a freebee: The Arch of Hysteria is not in the same pose as the body in the photograph Jeffery Dahmer took of his victim, and the photo was taken before the victim was beheaded. It's also impossible to understand how the artist of the statue (who has never stated that it was inspired by Dahmer) had access to police crime photos before the Internet, since the statue was sculpted in 1993.
And yet this is still used as "evidence". It's nonsense.
Same goes for the other "disturbing art". None of the actual fucked-up paintings from the one artist are in Podesta's house, but you use the other artwork she's created as evidence that Podesta is some kind of sick puppy.
Ridiculous. But hey, don't let me inspire you to change your information.