You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

"now the possible connection to pizzagate/pedogate"

Ok, I'm with you.

"The Congressional Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus is credited with nationalizing the successful AMBER Alert system."

Ok. What's next?

"I find this strange because same source says"

Ok (expecting something that doesn't jive with nationalizing the Amber Alert system).

"Lampson sponsored legislation to fund law enforcement efforts to stop child pornography and exploitation on the Internet."

You lost me here. Lampson sponsored legislation to help stop child pornography. Why is that inconsistent with nationalizing the Amber Alert system?

It seems like both dovetail nicely in fact. Could you explain in more detail what you're thinking? I'm sure it's valid, I just have a hard time understanding the specifics.

Thank you.

Bluebirdsolitude ago

I guess that was poorly worded. It was odd to me as viewed by the questions regarding his other connections. I was trying to reconcile his actions. His whole congressional career and elections, although nothing overt, always carried a whiff of impropriety. The missing childrens caucus and Amber Alert seem noble things, so why would a former Republican congressman, if an honorable man, be employed by a man of highly questionable character? Why would he schmooze with Hill with all her baggage? Birds of a feather flock together. At who's behest, if any, did he formulate the Missing and Exploited Children Caucus and at who's behest did he pursue nationalizing Amber Alert and is it in anyway connected to the Pakistani ties he has now, since Hill seems to be so deferential to the Pakistani ties? Those ties go back some years. Or was it all completely as it seems, concern for missing children. I have not had time to look at the legislation nor at the 120 caucus members. I guess my suspicious mind is questioning if his intent in the caucus and Amber Alert is true or is nefarious.

By no means am I saying Lampson is involved in pedophilia, but that kind of crime cannot be practiced so openly, and it seems, with so much public knowledge in high places, without aiding and abetting and turning of the head from others, and to what gain would others aid and abet? By law, they are just as culpable as the actual perpetrator.

DarkMath ago

I totally understand what you're saying. Yes anyone working with Hillary Clinton on anything is suspect. They're either a victim or a co-conspirator. There are no exceptions. The woman is the purest form of evil I have ever seen in my life.

Fightforright ago

I agree. She is cruel and I am sick of her getting away with so many crimes.