You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Lonesome_Pizza ago

I don't want to leave this forum, as it is very active, I think we need to create a lot more specific Pizzagate subverses. for example pizzagatenews, pizzagateoccult, pizzagate 1, pizzagate 2, pizzagate 3. We have to divide the shill army to make things more difficult for them. Plus by categorizing the pizzagate subverses, we'll have more organized information and evidence, plus it will be harder for shills to slide the threads with disinfo

rwb ago

There is one change I think would be extremely effective at countering so called shills, and that would be to ban the word shill altogether. Being forced to confront another member using a sentence constructed without the word shill would be thoroughly daunting to those who are here only to create dissension. It is a mathematical certainty that those who use the word shill most often and who constantly level the charge against others are in fact the actual shills, and it is their greatest weapon. The quality of discourse can only improve from such a change.

NeedPolyGF ago

If we wanted to talk about s h i l l s, what word would we have to use instead?

rwb ago

Mmmm.. perhaps bona fide, as in he/she's a bona fide shill. Not that it has any chance of actually being implemented en mass. The David Seaman Bashing Group is almost exclusively comprised of bona fide shills, because they refuse to acknowledge that vicious attacks and efforts to destroy him (of the kind we see here all the time) can only hurt the movement, because the majority of well intentioned PG followers - who want justice above all else - either like him or are neutral. Even those not fond of David's approach would not attack him the way he's been attacked if they were truly interested in justice above all else.