My goodness, I'm getting sick and tired of these shills and I'm plenty sure that others feel the same. I'll keep it brief, We need to find a strategy to combat the shills and their disinformation, we need to utilize the other pizzagate forums to effectively divide the shill army, Sun Tzu style.
Drop a comment below, If you have any ideas on how to combat the shills in this war on knowledge.
Other Pizzagate forums:
-
https://voat.co/v/AskPizzagate
-
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever
view the rest of the comments →
Lonesome_Pizza ago
I don't want to leave this forum, as it is very active, I think we need to create a lot more specific Pizzagate subverses. for example pizzagatenews, pizzagateoccult, pizzagate 1, pizzagate 2, pizzagate 3. We have to divide the shill army to make things more difficult for them. Plus by categorizing the pizzagate subverses, we'll have more organized information and evidence, plus it will be harder for shills to slide the threads with disinfo
rwb ago
There is one change I think would be extremely effective at countering so called shills, and that would be to ban the word shill altogether. Being forced to confront another member using a sentence constructed without the word shill would be thoroughly daunting to those who are here only to create dissension. It is a mathematical certainty that those who use the word shill most often and who constantly level the charge against others are in fact the actual shills, and it is their greatest weapon. The quality of discourse can only improve from such a change.
NeedPolyGF ago
If we wanted to talk about s h i l l s, what word would we have to use instead?
rwb ago
Mmmm.. perhaps bona fide, as in he/she's a bona fide shill. Not that it has any chance of actually being implemented en mass. The David Seaman Bashing Group is almost exclusively comprised of bona fide shills, because they refuse to acknowledge that vicious attacks and efforts to destroy him (of the kind we see here all the time) can only hurt the movement, because the majority of well intentioned PG followers - who want justice above all else - either like him or are neutral. Even those not fond of David's approach would not attack him the way he's been attacked if they were truly interested in justice above all else.
Lonesome_Pizza ago
Excellent, we should use a special codeword to mark those who we suspect as being so called "shills"
AssFaceSandwich2 ago
That repeats the effect and just changes the word used, defeating the op's point.
Lonesome_Pizza ago
You're right also, the codeword will only be useful to a certain extent. I still believe we should have specific pizzagate subverses, rather than depending on 1 main subverse for all of our information, as the old saying goes, "dont put all your eggs in 1 basket".With all our eggs in 1 basket, the shills only have to attack 1 very popular main pizzagate subverse, we should have more pizzagate subverses with specific categories, so that our evidence will be more organized and so the shills will have to divide their forces to deal with us.
rwb ago
This is true. Admittedly, I don't view the problem so much as needing to label them as it is to remove their ability to cloud the water with the use of the term. I think most posters reveal what side their on merely by the content of their posts, until the "shill" war erupts, when the term is then bandied about with such reckless abandon by both sides, it becomes hard to discern who is who. Having a discussion about who is a shill when those under consideration are leveling the charge right back becomes fatiguing, which is exactly what they want and get. And any code word agreed upon in public would be quickly co-opted. A simple ban is what's needed. It's potential effect will never be known unless it's tried.