Noone thinks he's innocent, but theres no hard proof yet thats viable in court. It's a CIA 'limited hangout' to distract from the actual ones running it, which is the CIA via DynCorp
Uhhhh I love how one day Alex Jones issues a fake retraction and the next day everyone goes back to saying James Alefantis can't be proven guilty in court. 1) Obviously he is NOT INNOCENT. 2) Circumstantial evidence is usually the only evidence there is, unless we are talking about a crime with a victim testifying or a body, which we aren't going to have without DNA evidence from crime scenes and bodies, and with children who are too young to testify. He needs to be INVESTIGATED by the FBI, but of course we seem to have a little problem with that if he is CIA. Trump needs to roll up the pedos within the government. This is a huge problem. When the government is full of traffickers you have loyalists everywhere. The only people who "Think he is innocent" or who think this stuff isn't good enough evidence to presume he is guilty (in our minds, regardless of the jury's instructions) are non-lawyers, and Democrats who buy into the "Fake News" "Russia" crap. Don't fall for that or repeat it. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. When you feed your victim to hogs or eat them in Satanic rituals that doesn't mean the person didn't go missing.
I wonder if when you eat another human being or drink their blood whether it leaves behind trace DNA in your bodily tissues the way that a baby's DNA floats forever in the mother's brain?
view the rest of the comments →
Fatsack ago
Noone thinks he's innocent, but theres no hard proof yet thats viable in court. It's a CIA 'limited hangout' to distract from the actual ones running it, which is the CIA via DynCorp
cakeoflightylight ago
Uhhhh I love how one day Alex Jones issues a fake retraction and the next day everyone goes back to saying James Alefantis can't be proven guilty in court. 1) Obviously he is NOT INNOCENT. 2) Circumstantial evidence is usually the only evidence there is, unless we are talking about a crime with a victim testifying or a body, which we aren't going to have without DNA evidence from crime scenes and bodies, and with children who are too young to testify. He needs to be INVESTIGATED by the FBI, but of course we seem to have a little problem with that if he is CIA. Trump needs to roll up the pedos within the government. This is a huge problem. When the government is full of traffickers you have loyalists everywhere. The only people who "Think he is innocent" or who think this stuff isn't good enough evidence to presume he is guilty (in our minds, regardless of the jury's instructions) are non-lawyers, and Democrats who buy into the "Fake News" "Russia" crap. Don't fall for that or repeat it. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. When you feed your victim to hogs or eat them in Satanic rituals that doesn't mean the person didn't go missing.
I wonder if when you eat another human being or drink their blood whether it leaves behind trace DNA in your bodily tissues the way that a baby's DNA floats forever in the mother's brain?